What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Double or nothing: Why the NRL TV rights are worth $1 billion

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/exp...worth-1-billion/2009/05/15/1242335881328.html

Double or nothing: Why the NRL TV rights are worth $1 billion

Roy Masters | May 16, 2009

NRL club bosses will press chief executive David Gallop to demand $1 billion in TV rights fees in the next broadcasting contract following the release of a confidential report showing rugby league has closed the viewership gap on the AFL over the past three years, with both codes having a cumulative audience of 120 million last year.

Rugby league has also continued its popularity on pay-TV, seizing 15 of the top 20 most popular programs last year, while the AFL's most watched game came in 26th, despite an improved programming deal in the existing broadcasting contract.

AFL boss Andrew Demetriou said recently he would expect an increase of $200m on the AFL's five-year deal of $780m, prompting one NRL club chief to say: "If they can get a billion dollars for the same audience we get, we should get a billion."

The NRL's six-year deal (2007-12) with Channel Nine-Fox Sports is valued at $500m, well below the AFL's contract, despite both codes staging the same number of games each week.

While the revelations on an ABC Four Corners program concerning the group sex incident involving Matthew Johns is expected to hurt the NRL in the corporate marketplace with sponsorships, TV ratings have surged since the launch of the season, when the code was forced to cancel an advertising campaign that had focused on Brett Stewart, after he was charged with the sexual assault of a 17-year-old girl.

This year, Channel Nine's NRL coverage of rounds one to five attracted an average capital city audience of 761,000 per match, up 9 per cent on last season's average, based on OzTAM figures. Nine's second match on Friday night, up 42 per cent in Sydney and Brisbane on last year's average, is driving most of this increase.

By comparison, the AFL's free-to-air audiences this year after three rounds (Seven's Friday night game 717,000; Ten's Saturday game 536,000 and evening game 774,000 and Seven's Sunday game 529,000) are down across all matches on the previous year, and well below 2007 figures. "Our NRL ratings are only in two capital cities [Sydney and Brisbane]," said Nine sports director Steve Crawley, drawing a difference with AFL figures which embrace five capitals.

Regional ratings - the NRL has strong followings in rural NSW and Queensland - are not included in this year's figures.

The free-to-air components of the TV rights deals of both codes show the AFL receives almost twice as much per game, despite the NRL rising in popularity.

The AFL receives $465m for five years for four games a week, or $23m for the right to telecast one game each week for a year, while the NRL gets $250m over six years for three games a week, or $14m for a game a week each year.

Pay TV figures also reflect the popularity of rugby league, with NRL matches on Fox Sport last year making up two-thirds of the top 100. The AFL had only 10 top 100 programs, and its most popular game - Fremantle versus Essendon - came 26th.

Foxtel paid Seven and Ten $315.5m over five years to cover four live matches a week, equal to $15.8m for the right to televise one game a week for the season.

Fox Sports pay the NRL $42m a year for five games, or $8.4m or the right to televise one game a week for the season.

Insofar as News Ltd owns both half the NRL and half Fox Sports, the pay TV rights' underpayment reflects badly on this continuing conflict of interest.

This year, Fox Sports' live viewing for the first five NRL rounds (Saturday evening average viewing per match 279,000; Sunday 210,000; Monday evening 268,000) is well ahead of the AFL's 182,000 average for the first three rounds.

NRL viewing is up 3 per cent on last season's average and the same rounds last year, while AFL is up 8 per cent on last year's average and 9 per cent on the same rounds last year.

Foxtel penetration is highest in Sydney, with a report commissioned by the NRL quoting a Foxtel executive in March this year saying, "Rugby league is a key driver for our Sydney penetration. It is rare to get a single decision-making purchase, but NRL is an important tentpole factor."

Of pay TV's 100 most popular programs last year, a rugby union Test came in first; two football World Cup qualifier matches occupied the next two positions, then came the NRL's top game, Cowboys versus Storm.

Overall, NRL occupied 66 spots; Test cricket 12; AFL 10; union Tests 4; America's Next Top Model 4; World Cup football qualifiers 3; Super 14 rugby 1.

However, free-to-air coverage has been largely responsible for NRL closing the gap on overall TV figures with the AFL, which has lost one free-to-air game to pay.

Since 2005, Channel Nine's NRL audience has increased 7 per cent a year, driven predominantly by viewership in an additional Friday night game introduced in 2007.

The introduction of the Titans and the double-header format has increased Queensland audiences by 25 per cent, with limited effect on NSW viewership until this year when the combination of games which are close and free at a time of global recession has boosted the second Friday night match by 42 per cent.

The AFL's expectation of a $1b TV contract beginning in 2012 is based on an additional game each week, as a result of a western Sydney team starting that year and a Gold Coast team entering the competition in 2011.

To win the extra revenue, the AFL might be willing to abandon its set fixture schedule to allow broadcasters flexibility to maximise ratings, with double-headers, such as Collingwood matches in Melbourne and West Coast-Fremantle matches in Perth on Friday nights.

Channel Nine televises higher- ranked, closer-positioned NRL teams on Friday night in prime time, again indicating how the NRL is underpaid by the broadcasters.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,489
Good article.

You can see how much Fox sports values the NRL, tonights games are not even being shown tonight!

Wait for the Gallop response: We are not national, they pay more as they want to attract new viewers (whatever the frik that means!), they have more adverts and the games run longer.....etc etc etc
 

1 Eyed TEZZA

Coach
Messages
12,420
Isnt there something that can be done. This argument is waged every week on here but this conflict of interest is illegal isnt it? Cant a class action be taken against News Ltd for constricting money to our clubs and the ARL?
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,489
I am surprised the anti monopoly commision hasn't cast an eye over the situation. TBF the majority of fans don't seem to care otherwise we would be campaigning, showing our disgust etc. Ultimatley if the clubs continue to tow the line and the fans stay apathetic then who is going to change it?
 

Dogs Of War

Coach
Messages
12,721
Hopefully Roy can just posting these articles every few months, to make sure it stays current in peoples minds. You know that the News Ltd guys aren't going to write articles about it.
 
Messages
2,016
Personally I think the AFL is having a wank if they think they're going to get more than last time. That deal was done in a booming economy and with 9 and 10/7 aggressively competing for the rights. Unless there is a serious rival bidder again they'll be lucky to even get what they did last time.

I'd be thinking the next lot of rights will end up something like $700m for the AFL, $600m for NRL. It would vastly help the NRL's cause if there was a serious rival bid to 9's.
 

blacktip-reefy

Immortal
Messages
34,079
Personally I think the AFL is having a wank if they think they're going to get more than last time. That deal was done in a booming economy and with 9 and 10/7 aggressively competing for the rights. Unless there is a serious rival bidder again they'll be lucky to even get what they did last time.

Absolutely wrong. They will get that figure easy. The plasma generation has taken entertainment home & it is growing at an incredible rate.

The thing that Roy has selectively left out as why the AFL should receive more money , has nothing to do with anything that can be really changed. perhaps a time out rule in league, may help.
But the issue is game time & opportunities for advertising.
NRL has a 1.5 hour live time slot. AFL has close to 3 hours
Advertising space in NRL game = 5 minutes pre-show 5 minutes pre game 5 minutes half time 5 minutes post game 5 minutes post show.
On channel nine a break in play can probably see another 5 or 6 15' spots thrown in.
AFL has all of those + 2X 3 min qrtrs plus a 30' spot each goal.
Its double almost, per game.
 

Surely

Post Whore
Messages
101,225
Its whats killing nrl clubs, they have to cop crap timeslots for crowd attendances because they are great timeslots for Fox.
 

Edwahu

Bench
Messages
3,697
Absolutely wrong. They will get that figure easy. The plasma generation has taken entertainment home & it is growing at an incredible rate.

The thing that Roy has selectively left out as why the AFL should receive more money , has nothing to do with anything that can be really changed. perhaps a time out rule in league, may help.
But the issue is game time & opportunities for advertising.
NRL has a 1.5 hour live time slot. AFL has close to 3 hours
Advertising space in NRL game = 5 minutes pre-show 5 minutes pre game 5 minutes half time 5 minutes post game 5 minutes post show.
On channel nine a break in play can probably see another 5 or 6 15' spots thrown in.
AFL has all of those + 2X 3 min qrtrs plus a 30' spot each goal.
Its double almost, per game.

Yes, however I would argue that the afl ratings are now so poor in nsw and Queensland that the length of the games is a negative. Stations have to spend more ad time showing a product that does not rate.
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,348
Good article.

Wait for the Gallop response: We are not national, they pay more as they want to attract new viewers (whatever the frik that means!), they have more adverts and the games run longer.....etc etc etc

So in effect Gallop is arguing the case for AFL to get more money.

What a great leader.
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,348
Yes, however I would argue that the afl ratings are now so poor in nsw and Queensland that the length of the games is a negative. Stations have to spend more ad time showing a product that does not rate.

Exactly.

3 hours of getting belted by the Iron Chef in more than half the country is hardly going to be a reason to get more money.
 

gottabegood

Juniors
Messages
571
Well done Roy.

The question needs to be asked why these club "bosses" have not lifted a voice in anger at Gollum and News Ltd.

They seem to make a lot of noise about pokies tax and cigs etc but never about the main source of RL's income. Why is this so....

Who is in whose pocket.
 
Top