Noise
Coach
- Messages
- 18,279
I doubt they will stay this way. Gutherson at least will end up back in the team.
At left centre, with Jennings on the right, French on the wing and Hayne at fullback
I doubt they will stay this way. Gutherson at least will end up back in the team.
That's one possibility. But Gutherson's strength is his work rate, which is best utilised at fullback (or the halves).At left centre, with Jennings on the right, French on the wing and Hayne at fullback
That's one possibility. But Gutherson's strength is his work rate, which is best utilised at fullback (or the halves).
For sure but that’s not the “wrong decision” we’re talking about because BA’s hands were tied with this one. These are the f**k ups im referring to:I doubt they will stay this way. Gutherson at least will end up back in the team.
None of those things were f**k ups. All were done with good reason.For sure but that’s not the “wrong decision” we’re talking about because BA’s hands were tied with this one. These are the f**k ups im referring to:
1. French at Fullback
2. Jennings on the left, Hayne on the right
3. Leaving Kenny out of the round 1 side
Of course those things were done for a reason. If there was no reason for them they wouldn’t have been done. However, I am claiming that the reasons Noise, IALB and myself have identified for Edwards’ inclusion, French being moved to the wing and swapping Jennings to the right outweighed them. So the initial decision was “a mistake”.None of those things were f**k ups. All were done with good reason.
Ultimately every decision is a matter of assessing risk and reward. Just because in a couple of instances something did or didn't appear to work doesn't mean it is the only viable option. No more than flipping three straight heads means that the result of a coin toss is anything other than fifty fifty.
We have a few players in our squad (including Hayne) whose 'best position' is conditional. Nothing is a foregone conclusion. It's probably our biggest weakness.
I think the 3 thingsnyou identified were pretty clearly logical decisions ...Of course those things were done for a reason. If there was no reason for them they wouldn’t have been done. However, I am claiming that the reasons Noise, IALB and myself have identified for Edwards’ inclusion, French being moved to the wing and swapping Jennings to the right outweighed them. So the initial decision was “a mistake”.
I think the 3 thingsnyou identified were pretty clearly logical decisions ...
Jennings has always favoured the left and hayne right when he has played a side
French was always been touted a fullback
Our forwards were a total coin toss as to who would miss out
Hayne’s defence in the centres has been suspect so pairing him next to Moses was ridiculous, particularly considering how successful Jennings was there last year in both attack and defence.I think the 3 thingsnyou identified were pretty clearly logical decisions ...
Jennings has always favoured the left and hayne right when he has played a side
French was always been touted a fullback
Our forwards were a total coin toss as to who would miss out
Do you reckon 50% of people on here had Edwards out of their round 1 side?Haynes centre defense would probably be just as poor on the left ... norman aint a particularly great defender either
I get your points but i reckon they are al at least 50/50 calls
50% of people on here dont coach the teamDo you reckon 50% of people on here had Edwards out of their round 1 side?
Correct. Which goes to show how big of a f**k up it was.50% of people on here dont coach the team
I'd like to thank poupou escobar - he taught me everything i know
I personally would NOT have left kenny out - i think last year showed he provides great energy to our teamCorrect. Which goes to show how big of a f**k up it was.
And Kenny is the clear winner as an edge forward over them all. I’d also have him over Ma’u. Another option would have been having Moeroa play in the middle and dropping Matagi. It’s easy for me to say this in hindsight but we were also stating this in the lead up to round 1 after the side was announced.I personally would NOT have left kenny out - i think last year showed he provides great energy to our team
But i can see the choice was to leave one of - kenny, taka, moeroa - out of the team .... im just saying its not totally ridiculous that kenny was the one who missed out
wasn't he unavailable due to injury?Do you reckon 50% of people on here had Edwards out of their round 1 side?
The problem with dropping matagi is we end up with really only 1 middle forward who is prodominantly a hard ball runner - evans ... mannah, alvaro, brown, scott, moeroa are really workers .... i can understand picking matagi .... tho i also think he and evans have been a bit disappointing so far this season (mind you they are not on their own)And Kenny is the clear winner as an edge forward over them all. I’d also have him over Ma’u. Another option would have been having Moeroa play in the middle and dropping Matagi. It’s easy for me to say this in hindsight but we were also stating this in the lead up to round 1 after the side was announced.
So for mine, the decision was as ridiculous as you can get and the result tends to agree.
Nope. Not selected in round 1, injured for round 2wasn't he unavailable due to injury?
He was left out round 1wasn't he unavailable due to injury?
That’s a fair point but I think we have sufficient go forward at the end and start of each half with Evans and Tep as our metre eaters, with Kenny given a roving licence to help out in the middle as well.The problem with dropping matagi is we end up with really only 1 middle forward who is prodominantly a hard ball runner - evans ... mannah, alvaro, brown, scott, moeroa are really workers .... i can understand picking matagi .... tho i also think he and evans have been a bit disappointing so far this season (mind you they are not on their own)