Jake the snake
Coach
- Messages
- 17,663
Wouldn't it be funny if we were under the cap if thry accept Watmoughs retirement and then we go get hayne for the rest of the season
That would be gold
Wouldn't it be funny if we were under the cap if thry accept Watmoughs retirement and then we go get hayne for the rest of the season
Cap breach overstated, hints auditor as Watmough puts Eels first
The Australian
May 6, 2016 12:00AM
Brent Read
Senior sports writer
Sydney
Parramatta yesterday submitted papers to fast-track Anthony Watmough’s retirement, but their greatest cause for optimism was provided by former salary cap auditor Ian Schubert amid suggestions he had calculated the club’s salary cap breach could be significantly less than the figure claimed by the NRL.
Schubert, brought in by the Eels as a consultant to help the club negotiate their cap minefield, has spent recent days poring over myriad cap allegations made against the club by the NRL.
It is understood he believes the situation is nowhere near as dire as the NRL has indicated — in handing down its findings against the Eels, the game’s governing body suggested Parramatta were more than $560,000 over the cap for this season. Schubert’s calculations, which put the breach closer to $200,000, represent an alarming discrepancy between his own figures and those that were included in the documentation handed to the club by the NRL.
Should he be proven correct, it would dramatically heighten the chances of the club being under the salary cap in time for their game against South Sydney next week, particularly if the NRL takes a sympathetic view towards their application to have Watmough *retired under the career-ending injury guidelines.
The Eels yesterday filed the paperwork for Watmough’s retirement — he is yet to play this year as he struggles with a debilitating knee injury — and the former NSW and Australia forward broke his silence to confirm he would do whatever was best for the club.
He also spoke of his belief that the five officials at the centre of the allegations would do the same. Those five — chairman Steve Sharp, fellow directors Tom Issa and Peter Serrao, chief executive John Boulous and football manager Daniel Anderson — are due to return to the Supreme Court this morning as they continue *action against the NRL.
The NRL has refused to deal with the club while the legal action remains afoot and it is understood some of the parties, who have requested an extension in their time to respond to the NRL allegations, are open to stepping aside if it would remove an impediment to the Eels getting under the cap.
Others are believed to be ready to seek directions from the court ordering the NRL to work with them until they have the opportunity to respond to the allegations, a view that would serve only to inflame an already tense situation.
Their incendiary stance — it is believed the directors received initial legal advice that the NRL investigation was shoddy and full of holes — was yesterday mirrored by one of the directors to emerge with his reputation intact.
Parramatta lord mayor Paul Garrard accused NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg of grandstanding during a meeting with the players earlier this week to announce the salary cap sanctions. “Tell the truth if you want to be a white knight,” Garrard told The Australian.
Garrard’s anger was inflamed by suggestions the directors believed as late as last week that they were as much as $200,000 under the cap for this season.
However, The Australian understands the NRL rolled all the club’s third parties for the past three years — $760,000 in total — into this year’s payments because they believed they were guaranteed, pushing the club over the cap.
The Eels mitigated some of the damage yesterday when Melbourne announced they had signed Eels centre Ryan Morgan for the remainder of the year.
Morgan’s move came on another dramatic day for the club, with the NSW Office of Liquor and Gaming confirming it was investigating the NRL findings to see whether there had been any breaches of the Registered Clubs Act that require further action.
Watmough also spoke for the first time about his future, indicating he would be prepared to retire if it meant the club would be able to steer its way out of trouble.
“The club’s bigger than me and, if I get the chance to do the right thing and have to do what I have to do for the boys to move forward, it’s a no-brainer for me,” Watmough told the Nine Network.
“My best interest has always been the club and, if it comes to that, it comes to that.
“(Rugby league has) definitely passed the body by. We’re sewww.leagueunlimited.comess people out there at Parra — the playing group is anyway. I can’t speak from outside of that. I’ve done all I can do. I can’t do any more.”
Sensible post Jake. That's why chasing a rduction in points etc via the courts simply has to take a back seat at the moment compared to getting our squad cap compliant so that the team can play for points next Friday.I see your point and the angle you are coming from but what you are forgetting is We assembled a team which was over the cap with Watmough in the team at that point of time with Watmough fully fit. There has to be a penalty for that. If Watmough was still fit / playing with the current team and we had no insurance option what would our position be?
If there's no penalty / deterrent every team would do the same. The NRL's view would be that we should not have been able to negotiate and recruit other players whilst we were over the cap. Yes, we now have the opportunity to get back under on a insurance technicality but it still doesn't erase the signings we made in the past when we were not supposed to.
Merkins !However, The Australian understands the NRL rolled all the club’s third parties for the past three years — $760,000 in total — into this year’s payments because they believed they were guaranteed, pushing the club over the cap.
KIIS FM radio host Jackie O opened this morning’s show with a public apology to Parramatta Eels captain Kieran Foran.
This follows reports that Foran and his former partner launched legal against Jackie O over her on-air claims the footballer was not the father of one of his two young children.
Last night a statement was released from Australian Radio Network in response to these claims.
“It has been reported in other media that legal action has been taken against KIIS 1065 regarding comments made on air. As of 9pm today KIIS 1065 has not sighted any legal letter,” the statement read.
“Jackie and the KIIS team are mortified that anything said has caused hurt to Kieran Foran and his family at such a difficult time. We apologise unreservedly for this and wish them all the best.”
That would mean that being deemed $570K over the cap for this year really meant that we had been $190K under the cap, until these TPAs were included as a result of the investigation.However, The Australian understands the NRL rolled all the club’s third parties for the past three years — $760,000 in total — into this year’s payments because they believed they were guaranteed, pushing the club over the cap.
I don't know mate. My contact has nothing to do with the board or any factions.
Here you go HJ, send them your thoughts on the matter.... eelsreception@parraeels.com.auSo, then, what? You and I just leave it to chance that they'll figure this out?
Considering the implications of success in this avenue, isn't that a little silly? And if it appears that we're the ones who can see it, to date, don't we have an obligation to ensure the information gets to where it is needed?
Here you go HJ, send them your thoughts on the matter.... eelsreception@parraeels.com.au
However, The Australian understands the NRL rolled all the club’s third parties for the past three years — $760,000 in total — into this year’s payments because they believed they were guaranteed, pushing the club over the cap.
So this is where it all boils down to .... every single TPA being considered illegal .... are they all? .... media reports suggest some are, but are they all?
If the NRL has overstated things with no evidence then i reckon our best bet is to prove it. Get supposedly cap compliant now via watmough n whatever - then keep pushing with proving the NRLs claim is overs and get some of the 12 back later
If this report is accurate it claims previous years TPAs are rolled into this year. What about the supposed $3M over 4 years? WTF does that come from?
Sensible post Jake. That's why chasing a rduction in points etc via the courts simply has to take a back seat at the moment compared to getting our squad cap compliant so that the team can play for points next Friday.
Worry about everything else, hypotheticals, future board composition etc later on - we've got the whoel season for that.
Has the NRL given our board the evidence they found yet? ie the allegations of fake or over inflated invoices ? If true that's a criminal act, I can't see is getting a reduction in points just based on these serious allegations.