f**k the bear!! ... poke the shit out of it!! ... poke poke pokeUm...he was just responding to BA's stupid comments. If BA doesn't go there Bellamy doesn't say anything. Campaign behind the scenes but don't publicly poke the bear.
I actually thought Bellamy's response was pretty good tbh.
Cronulla and the Roosters have been doing this for years as well.Bellamy is right - we do lay over the ruck inside the 20m. We seem to have that train of thought that we'll back our line defense so it's ok to give away a penalty in order to set our line or shut down momentum of the opposition.
Remember, we almost had a player binned against the Broncos for it
They get away with being 3m in front of the ref all game.Looking at the results this year, the only team that has troubled a full strength Storm twice is Sharks.
So what do they do better than others ?
Spoil like merkins.Looking at the results this year, the only team that has troubled a full strength Storm twice is Sharks.
So what do they do better than others ?
Looking at the results this year, the only team that has troubled a full strength Storm twice is Sharks.
So what do they do better than others ?
My side would suprise a few but wont be picked.
Auvau would be dropped for the safer Hoffman.
Bevan in for Smith
Vave out for Frank
Finals games and a guy like Frank bring experience. Vave will get slowed down by storms defense too much.
Auvau defensive liability will outway his attack. Not that his attacks great just his run backs.
Bevans a no brainer.
Not sure if fit what Peni would bring. I like the guy a lot but he hasnt played. Id stick with Matagi.
We are also salary cap cheats. Remember?
We also slow down the ruck. Last time I checked lots of other teams do as well.
Because he has just pissed off the best coach in the game and he happens to coach the best team in the game.
Spoken like a man with his Blue and Gold glasses on. Every fan thinks their team is constantly dudded by the refs. I have watched every game this year and I reckon the dodgy 50-50 calls ended up being exactly that, 50-50. We have had plenty of good calls go our way.
That's exactly the reason why I thought it wasn't clever. Why would we want to fire them up? Our best chance is to keep things low key and steal their lunch money when they aren't looking.
If he is genuinely concerned about Melbourne's tactics, wouldn't it be more sensible to quietly campaign behind the scenes?
Vave has 1 or 2 good runs a game but overall is sluggish. Id rather Frank or Terepo
Some good points.
I guess what Arthur was trying to do, maybe, was get the Storm fired up; it's not uncommon to see even the most professional athletes lose their cool because of emotion.
No doubt that Arthur was also frustrated that we again got caned in the penalty count.
I have no time for Bellamy - I think despite being the best of the best, he's a whiny twat -, but I think he was within his rights to fire back then.
Still - it's kinda funny that he's complaining about us falling asleep on tackles players, when Melbourne practically invented the tactic under his guidance.
So when we do it it's 'good tactics' but when the Storm do it they 'change the game for the worse'....hmmmmCronulla and the Roosters have been doing this for years as well.
We do this as well and we make the top 4. So it looks like it's good tactics.
I guess that's BA's approach.f**k the bear!! ... poke the shit out of it!! ... poke poke poke
What a f**ken idiot.