F*ck You Tim Sheens And F*ck Off Ben Teo!!

[TheMasterplan]

We are so much better defensively with Gibbs in the side.
If a forward needs bagging, look at the 30 metre a game over-rated, bludging hack Te'o. He makes Noel Cleal look like Ray Price

 

[Marshall_magic]

I have been one of Gibbs biggest critics over the last couple of years but on Friday he was one of the few out there who actually seemed to care if we won or not.

T'eo on the other hand...

I have also been a huge Gibbs critic, but this year he really has pulled his finger out.

 

[Mish]

I have no issues with Gibbs he has improved this year. As long as he gets better not worse I'm happy, if he was on a downslide in form it would be different. Not sure why people are critical of him now.

 

[TimmyB]

Is it. Why?

You have no way of proving it to be correct and there's no way of proving it incorrect either. It's just a meaningless, one line cheap shot. It's the same as Moth claiming Marshall was moved to half back to cover Sheens' f**kup in signing Morris. In reality, in both instances it's probably because Sheens believes it be best for the team. Wrong he may be, but the sh*t about arrogance etc. is just boring, cheap and pointless.

I've read your posts previously and most of the time you've got a lot better to add to the discussion than that.


Chopsy: Obviously Head is a vastly superior halfback, don't get me wrong. However, I've rarely seen a halfback as MIA as Head was on Friday night. I've seriously doubts he would have even got into a position to take the shot had he been out on the field. In that sense I can totally understand why he was hooked Friday.

 

[rupertpupkin]

There is intrigue at the club with Brisbane's Joel Moon signing as a five-eighth on Saturday and agent David Riolo confirming the Warriors are interested in Wests Tigers halfback Mathew Head. Current halves Michael Witt and Grant Rovelli are under contract next year and the club will not comment on whether they are willing to release them or are sounding out rival teams regarding the pair.

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,23905665-5001023,00.html

 

[madunit]

Are we the worst team at taking field goals in the NRL? Madunit can you work out the stats as to how many games we've lost by 1 compared to how many we've won, my bet would be about 4:1.

Everytime we're set for a field goal the opposition seems to get to us with ease and we end up running it. We are an absolute shambles in this regard. You almost need the Benny Hill theme music to it.

since 2000

Tigers 17-16 Warriors (2000)
Penrith 32-31 Tigers (2000)
Souths 17-16 Tigers (extra time) (2004)
Tigers 37-36 Bulldogs (2005)
Raiders 19-18 Tigers (2006)
Tigers 25-24 Penrith (2007)
Tigers 29-28 Cronulla (2007)
Brisbane 19-18 Tigers (2008)

4 wins and 4 losses

not as bad as you think

 

[madunit]

I have been one of Gibbs biggest critics over the last couple of years but on Friday he was one of the few out there who actually seemed to care if we won or not.

T'eo on the other hand...

I agree, Gibbs was one of the best on field for that game. He was everywhere and busting his arse all night. If he could play like that every game, we'd be fairing much better.

Te'o keeps getting lazier and less involved every week now.

 

[simmo1]

since 2000

Tigers 17-16 Warriors (2000)
Penrith 32-31 Tigers (2000)
Souths 17-16 Tigers (extra time) (2004)
Tigers 37-36 Bulldogs (2005)
Raiders 19-18 Tigers (2006)
Tigers 25-24 Penrith (2007)
Tigers 29-28 Cronulla (2007)
Brisbane 19-18 Tigers (2008)

4 wins and 4 losses

not as bad as you think

Not entirely sure, but I think the Penrith 2007 one (and perhaps a few others?), the field goal was kicked before half time, so not really a 'field goal duel' there. As they said on commentary, we seem to hedge our bets with trying to score a try and score a field goal, without picking one and going 100%. The result: players running from sideline to sideline trying to do it all themself.

Also I was at the Penrith 2000 one, and was that where we were leading by 20+ and got run down? I think it may have been 31-8 at one stage.

 

[madunit]

you are correct on both counts.

The Tigers have also had two draws.

However, tiger nick wanted all of the 1 point margin games, and this is all of them.

 

[tiger_nick]

cheers MU, i suppose you seem to remember the losses as opposed to the wins.

theres been plenty of other games where we have stuufed field goal attempts and lost other ways. a few against canberra and one against penrith at leichhardt in 2002 i think

 

[madunit]

there's been a number of close games, and a number of games where we were leading by 20 odd and for some reason, we slotted a field goal over.

 

[simmo1]

We have a sh*thouse golden point record. Can't recall us ever winning one...?

 

[Crippler]

our 1 and only golden point win was last year against sharks at campbelltown.

 

[Marshall_magic]

our 1 and only golden point win was last year against sharks at campbelltown.

We also lost one against the chooks when Anasta faked the field goal shot then split us up the middle before firing it out to Monaghan to score. A must win game that one was, stuck in my memory.

 

[Dave Q]

Tim Sheens: a rugged gentlemen.


smh.com

 

[Mish]

shouldnt u be out celebrating a scrappy win or something??

 

[Dave Q]

shouldnt u be out celebrating a scrappy win or something??

What and miss giving you ugly lot something to whinge about?

Besides it was a good likeness of him.

 

[Callan Pk]

Time to go Mr Sheens, take your widdle mat roycey fudd with ya

Too long in one place, we all need a change

 

[matty-ducati]

shouldnt u be out celebrating a scrappy win or something??

mish i was at there game, should of seen it after the win its like they just won a grandfinal... i guess winning a game as a soufs supporter is like winning a grandfinal

 

[matty-ducati]

what a piss poor excuse for a topic... in 2005 every tigers fan and wtfanatic wanted to *edit*