Fifita

[BatteredFlake]

That shouldn't of even been a penalty and it wasn't for a flop geniuses. The ref clearly said "pushed him back in goal" which he actually didn't even achieve.

Should'nt HAVE even

In remembrance of a much loved former forumer

 

[Frenzy.]

HAHAHAHAHA

Hi Frank

 

[Card Shark]

That shouldn't of even been a penalty and it wasn't for a flop geniuses. The ref clearly said "pushed him back in goal" which he actually didn't even achieve.

Doesn't matter what anyone thinks, HE was always going to be penalised for it....geez, even Cameron Smith would've got penalised for it.

Refs are looking hard to give penalties when teams are trapped on their line & it was a f**king stupid thing to do!

Having said that, his discipline was good other than that & he ran straight & hard for the most part...his best game for a while. Wish others in the team could've lifted as much as he.

 

[BatteredFlake]

Don't need one as I'm not blaming the refs. That was just an error. Like calling Burgess offside when he wasn't

OK put your money where your mouth is ..... Hartley -cant count? just an error? Only takes one or two critical calls...or a simple plan, such as allow one side more time to hold down... But we all know human beings are all above such underhanded skullduggery to get what they want. .......... Business IS conspiracy .

 

[Surely]

I just wish they'd clean up around the play the ball, how many offside defenders with hands in the air does ennis have to dodge each match ?

 

[Arnold]

I would of thought it was obvious.

 

[BatteredFlake]

I would of thought it was obvious.

Watch Out for FRANK!!

 

[Arnold]

The good old days when Newman would of flogged me.

 

[Inferno]

Fifita was superb yesterday. Did the work of 2 forwards.

Given he's the only prop in the team I suppose he had to.

 

[SharkShocked]

You blokes are f**king kidding if you think that wasn't a penalty and a f**king stupid one at that.

Once the first player touches him and hes on the ground - he's held.

It was ALWAYS going to be a penalty and especially against Fifita because he is a targeted man, BECAUSE of his prior ill discipline.

He has no one else to blame but himself for the fact he has a target on his back.

He has been absolutely massive for us, no one is doubting that.

But he is one of the most ill disciplined players in the competition.

 

[Card Shark]

The good old days when Newman would of flogged me.

I fought yous was a knew bloke Ar'old?

 

[Arnold]

Consorting with criminals.... Bump.

 

[millersnose]

Come on arnie
Own up
Who were you

 

[Feej]

Anyone really surprised? Seriously?

 

[Feej]

Interesting that crims seem to have been integrating themselves with players more since the NRL and it's partners went all in on gambling. Coincidence much?

 

[Arnold]

Anyone really surprised? Seriously?

No. See post 1.

 

[Mr Angry]

section 93x of the Crimes Act 1900

Burrito Kelly

Next Game Uniform

 

[coolumsharkie]

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...onsorting-with-criminals-20160831-gr5s31.html

Cronulla CEO Lyall Gorman said: "It's important to put on the record that there are no fines, there are no sanctions, there are no assertions, there are no allegations, there are no charges at all," Gorman said. "He's been given a warning not to engage with certain elements in the commuminty. Andrew has taken that on board and will move forward. We will continue to support the player."

 

[Stake Removed]

This helps Fifita's case, ombudsman rebukes consorting laws due to high level of mistakes

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-20/acting-nsw-ombudsman-rebukes-use-of-consorting-laws/7527560

 

[Surely]

Half the merkins drinking at the local pub would be criminals

The main thing is not consorting with nrl executives