foreverinourshadow
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,400
think about it carter can back up cook as hooker and carter can play more positions than mcinnes can on the paddock, and carter is a far better player today than mcinnes.do we need to lose a bench position because of mcinnes?do we need to keep an extra centre or an extra winger or an extra fullback on the bench to back up inglis or aj or auvaá absolutely not,the answer is no and by having mcinnes on the run on side or having mcinnes on the bench simply means maybe nathan brown or musgrove or whomever drops off the bench for mcinnes. i think personally cook is a gun and mcinnes is ordinary why sacrifice an extra player as i stated to have 2 hookers it makes no sense!!if you think about it we are covered in the hooking dept and probably the forwards dept also but our stocks are low in the backs and i reckon we would be better serviced by adding an extra back on the bench than by adding mcinnes as a secondary extra hooker cook dont need mcinnes trust me!!!id be benching an extra back before id add mcinnes it makes no sense our back line needs help not our hooking position...in other words by adding mcinnes we will be one player short in our team.