herbert henry1908
Referee
- Messages
- 21,880
Agreed. Just not sure where this talk of signings has come from. A lot of the posts directly break the forum rules.
Forum rules? Never heard of her..
Agreed. Just not sure where this talk of signings has come from. A lot of the posts directly break the forum rules.
Forum rules? Never heard of her..
Was never that straight forward.
You're right, but there were a few "I've no doubt Naden will be better than Blake" style posts after his first game or two. I was excited about Naden early doors (and still think he has a place in the 30) but it was a bit ridiculous for a while there.
Even if you’re right, they could’ve moved on Edwards, Whare, Mansour or a combination of the three.
Instead we moved on one of our only strike options.
He did make a linebreak in the 201m he gained. He also grabbed a try assist.What did Blake do that was so outstanding? He didn’t make any line breaks, got tackled most times, nothing outstanding.
Do you think the Dogs wanted to lose Klemmer and Woods? WT would love to get rid of Matulino and Packer but you need a buyer and someone to clear enough space.
I doubt moving Whare and Edwards would clear enough assuming you get a buyer. The issue is 2-3 years down the track you chase the style of player you let go.
Hopefully when we need a centre one of the Flegg guys are fine to go
His best performance this year. I’m sure Naden has had at least one similar or better this year. He is talented, but I don’t think he has the work ethic to make him high class or elite! Never goes looking for the ball. Besides I could have made at least 100m today against the Broncs and I’m 60!
Michael Jennings didn't make 100metres and he had a decent game.His best performance this year. I’m sure Naden has had at least one similar or better this year. He is talented, but I don’t think he has the work ethic to make him high class or elite! Never goes looking for the ball. Besides I could have made at least 100m today against the Broncs and I’m 60!
Klemmer & Woods wanted out, if thats the case with Blake then there’s not a heap we could do. But I have a feeling it wasn’t. We know there’s a clearing of players going on, seems more club instigated.
Remember as well we moved on Blake when the club possibly still had hope Egan was the answer at 9. It became more apparent as the season went on that he wasn’t ready. So I’m not sure Blake was moved on for us to get a Hooker.
Maybe Blake preferred hook's coaching style. Who knows but in these cases there has to be both parties wanting out
If the club tells a player they’re not wanted, pretty good chance they’ll leave. No one wants to be somewhere like that.
The only hang up is the contract, as long as they’re not losing much money they’ll go.
What did Blake do that was so outstanding? He didn’t make any line breaks, got tackled most times, nothing outstanding.
The tries that Sivo scored were regulation and To’o would have scored them.
True, Sivo was a loss, but I don’t think Blake is that great a loss.
Michael Jennings didn't make 100metres and he had a decent game.
Blake had 17 runs... making more metres than any back on the field other than Gutho. His work ethic looked pretty good to me. More importantly he also used his winger.
Remember when some people thought Naden was a good replacement for Blake?
Going off Nrl.com he doesn't. Although I wouldnt be surprised if Sivo had more metres than they credit him for.Sivo had more metres than Blake also.