8Ball
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,132
But don't claim I said stuff when I didn't.
You are the only one who claims you did stuff when you didn't.
"When I'm wrong I admit it." ;-)
But don't claim I said stuff when I didn't.
Both my quotes.
Don't claim I said said stuff when I didn't.
You are the only one who claims you did stuff when you didn't.
You said 'you' while quoting me.Did I name you? I said people. Not every other person. It was you that claimed "the gang" included everyone.
I never said that.
I did say what I said in an earlier post but it was deleted.
But don't claim I said stuff when I didn't.
Razor said:So it's ok for Hunt to "meet" 10 girls in one night, but not ok for a female to "meet" 3 guys in one night?
Razor said:Did you stalk Hunt and make a note of how many girls he f**ked that night did you?
He admitted it. If he was going to lie, he would have said that he met no girls.
Razor said:It's not that uncommon. The fact he was boasting about it just makes him look like a sad pathetic person.Mr Saab said:So you assume he f**ked 10 gals thats night...ron jeremy eat your heart out.
Razor said:The question the journalist asked was quite obvious in meaning. It's called context.
In everyday terms meet never means f**ked no. Never said it did. But that's what the journalist meant. Clearly without doubt. As I said, it's called context. A lot of other people in this thread thought the same thing as they posted earlier in this thread "Way to go Hunty", etc.
Doesn't take a brain surgeon to know what the journalist asked Hunt.
LOL
This is all over the place,what is the topic you're pertaining to?:?
In any case,you're obviously 14 with no comprehension of the opposite sex:lol:
Guys have two types of girls,the girls they'd hit and the type they take home to mum.
In accordance with that,you will probably find women will think either gender that is involved in this kind of situation is a bit of a trollop,it's usually the men that will high five one of the boys...
And all the trolling about things Razor might have said in the past on different unrelated issues. Thanks...Can we seriously take all the Razor posts into another thread? His posts are doing nothing but causing disruption.
You're the one who mentioned taking home to mum stuff in the first place? No wonder it's not just me that thinks your answer is all over the place.I'm not even going to start with your response Bartman LOL. I'm talking about in a clubbing/partying scenario anyway, not your "relationship" scenario. Three/four guys having sex with a girl is not related to a relationship/"take home to mum" situation in the slightest.
You're the one who mentioned taking home to mum stuff in the first place? No wonder it's not just me that thinks your answer is all over the place.
The gender role stuff about who has to ask and who gets to choose is bullsh*t, whether it's clubbing scenario or not. Generalising about gender roles never makes for convincing reasoning when discussing a particular situation.
People are people, just because you do or don't have a penis doesn't mean you have to assume a certain role. That type of thinking is where false excuses for behaviour that harms rugby league starts... oh, but they're blokes, so blokes are just like that etc - because it happens (or always has) doesn't make it rigth. Everyone should be responsible for their actions and choices, and for things like checking consent. Deal with that.
The difference between this and Greg Bird's situation is that charges have been laid, and Bird was caught out by his club lying to them initially about his involvement. The players in this situation haven't mislead their employer, nor do they have any charges pending so far, so I can see why they aren't stood down at this moment.
Group sex with consent in private is fine and right and legal and good luck to everybody.
Agree that it doesn't belong in a public toilet - it happens sure, but if rugby league players are involved in it it brings the game and their club/employer into disrepute. That's the issue (as well as the consent).
The difference between this and Greg Bird's situation is that charges have been laid, and Bird was caught out by his club lying to them initially about his involvement. The players in this situation haven't mislead their employer, nor do they have any charges pending so far, so I can see why they aren't stood down at this moment.
Yes, in general women who are sexually adventurous have been portrayed as s**ts, while men who are sexually adventurous are protrayed as heroes. But that doesn't mean that we have to perpetuate that. That doesn't mean that we have to fall in line with those (outdated) gender roles and double standards.
It's been good in this thread to see some people taking the whole notion of guys scoring whatever and however they can being held on a pedestal to task. And it's been good to see some people not jumping in and blaming or labelling the woman over the details of the allegations. Of course that has been mixed in with some of the usual bogan neanderthal points of view, but hey, different strokes for different folks I guess.
Group sex with consent in private is fine and right and legal and good luck to everybody.
Agree that it doesn't belong in a public toilet - it happens sure, but if rugby league players are involved in it it brings the game and their club/employer into disrepute. That's the issue (as well as the consent).
The difference between this and Greg Bird's situation is that charges have been laid, and Bird was caught out by his club lying to them initially about his involvement. The players in this situation haven't mislead their employer, nor do they have any charges pending so far, so I can see why they aren't stood down at this moment.
Yes, in general women who are sexually adventurous have been portrayed as s**ts, while men who are sexually adventurous are protrayed as heroes. But that doesn't mean that we have to perpetuate that. That doesn't mean that we have to fall in line with those (outdated) gender roles and double standards.
It's been good in this thread to see some people taking the whole notion of guys scoring whatever and however they can being held on a pedestal to task. And it's been good to see some people not jumping in and blaming or labelling the woman over the details of the allegations. Of course that has been mixed in with some of the usual bogan neanderthal points of view, but hey, different strokes for different folks I guess.
Can we seriously take all the Razor posts into another thread? His posts are doing nothing but causing disruption.
No apology necessary MWAL. You are entirely correct in that regard.I just want to correct a couple of misunderstood perceptions here and I apologise Bartman if it offends in anyway.
Bird was stood down not because he was charged. It is because he lied to teh CEO which resulted in the CEO issuing a statement saying Bird was not involved and the ensuing speculation of a cover up. The club has acted appropriately and until Bird explains his actions and events of that day to the club he will not play.