Sorry I didn't realise we all had to watch sport the same way as you. My bad.
Now you know.
Sorry I didn't realise we all had to watch sport the same way as you. My bad.
Sorry I didn't realise we all had to watch sport the same way as you. My bad.
That's your opinion, and you're entitled to it. I even agree with your last sentence, if I'm watching something I know is a delayed telecast I'll usually do the same.Seriously but checking scores is not "watching sport".
If you wanna watch footy on delay while getting live updates go for it. Live updates are easily avoidable though. I don't see how this is a problem with streaming delays. If I watch a game after its finished and don't wanna know the result I ignore the phone for 80 minutes.
One issue I think that's not well discussed about a service like this - typically your Foxtel cable or satellite signal is about 1-2 seconds behind real-time when it comes to a live broadcast. Any streaming service like this will be 10-30 seconds behind real-time. If you use social media or have apps that notify you about scores, this is actually a negative of streaming.
I think for now I'll stick with the cable plugged into my houseI’ve noticed that with the cricket. I’ve got the streaming Fox Sports on the NBN, it’s great but the Fox Sports Cricket app was giving me push-notices of wickets falling as the bowler was at the top of his mark to deliver the ball. I turned off notifications and it’s fine.
I think for now I'll stick with the cable plugged into my house
Er, how?
If your answer is the dopiest version of "herrr derrr get off social media" then try again.
Congratulations on ignoring the entire subsequent discussion, clown.yep, get off live game score sites whilst watching a game if you dont want to know what happens in 10seconds time lol. Heck we have some first world problem people in Australia!
Congratulations on ignoring the entire subsequent discussion, clown.
I don't believe that. I currently have a choice between what mechanisms I access sport and I'm choosing the one I currently have over the new model.Congratulations on sounding like some spoilt millennial who believes that not being able to see a live score website and watch a live game at the same time is some major life hardship. clown.
To be fair, that only happens when the Marsh brothers are batting cause the dude's typing in the live action for those apps just assumed they were about to get out anyway.... Nothing to do with any lag....I’ve noticed that with the cricket. I’ve got the streaming Fox Sports on the NBN, it’s great but the Fox Sports Cricket app was giving me push-notices of wickets falling as the bowler was at the top of his mark to deliver the ball. I turned off notifications and it’s fine.
I don't believe that. I currently have a choice between what mechanisms I access sport and I'm choosing the one I currently have over the new model.
That's my prerogative and I don't think it's a major life hardship, I'm having a legitimate discussion about it on an open forum. Jog on if you don't like it.
As someone who watches almost all their sport through streaming, it's actually funny to see that there are people defending it. Streaming, on the whole, is a step back from what is available through satellite. It is certainly the future, in particular because it is cheaper for the consumer, but anyone (like PR) who doesn't see that in many cases it's a regression of what has been available for a long time is misguided.
It's a bit like saying, 'why are you so worried about cameras being on every street corner and in your house...it shouldn't bother you if you have nothing to hide' PR's comments completely miss the point. Until streaming is as live as satellite, and the picture is as crisp as HD without hiccups, it's an inferior product to what exists, made only palatable by the price entry point.
Nah it's easier just to rag on 'millenials' or some bullshit, rather than discuss the genuine issues surrounding this.As someone who watches almost all their sport through streaming, it's actually funny to see that there are people defending it. Streaming, on the whole, is a step back from what is available through satellite. It is certainly the future, in particular because it is cheaper for the consumer, but anyone (like PR) who doesn't see that in many cases it's a regression of what has been available for a long time is misguided.
It's a bit like saying, 'why are you so worried about cameras being on every street corner and in your house...it shouldn't bother you if you have nothing to hide' PR's comments completely miss the point. Until streaming is as live as satellite, and the picture is as crisp as HD without hiccups, it's an inferior product to what exists, made only palatable by the price entry point.
pros and cons for both.
I’m not as active on social
media as I once was, I’ll probably cut the IQ4 I currently use away and go for Kayo as the delay doesn’t really bother me but each to their own.
I have NFL game pass and it is the tits. Whilst a different product, if Kayo can get some old NQ games from the last 15-20 years, along with the standard content from all the fox sports channels, it will be enough to keep me happy.
One issue I think that's not well discussed about a service like this - typically your Foxtel cable or satellite signal is about 1-2 seconds behind real-time when it comes to a live broadcast. Any streaming service like this will be 10-30 seconds behind real-time. If you use social media or have apps that notify you about scores, this is actually a negative of streaming.