taipan
Referee
- Messages
- 22,500
The Roosters are 2nd most followed team in the Hills area.
The Hills are alive with the sound of crowing.Ok I'll git my coat.
The Roosters are 2nd most followed team in the Hills area.
You can’t talk about Sydney stadiums without talking about NSO because it’s a great conversation/debate. It would be a perfect place for a stadium but there are huge obstacles like there isn’t a team to play there, but there should be.
No it isn't. North Sydney Ovals is a terrible ground to watch rugby league at, worse than the SCG in fact. It has all the viewing angle problems that the SCG has, namely you are on weird angles to the game, and can feel like you are miles away from the action, but with little of the elevated viewing possible at the SCG.
Further its amenities are sparse and antiquated to boot. In some respects it makes Leichhardt Oval seem like a mecca of modern standards by comparison.
Went for a walk around the Optus stadium precinct yesterday. Makes me laugh AFL are rplaying in 60k state of the art stadiums like that while some NRL fans are suggesting that someone should play at NSO, our ambition knows no bounds lol.
No it isn't. North Sydney Ovals is a terrible ground to watch rugby league at, worse than the SCG in fact. It has all the viewing angle problems that the SCG has, namely you are on weird angles to the game, and can feel like you are miles away from the action, but with little of the elevated viewing possible at the SCG.
Further its amenities are sparse and antiquated to boot. In some respects it makes Leichhardt Oval seem like a mecca of modern standards by comparison.
Why is it that people here want a stadium to cater for every other sport, but decry a stadium in the best RL nursery In the world because the area doesn’t support other codes?
Went for a walk around the Optus stadium precinct yesterday. Makes me laugh AFL are rplaying in 60k state of the art stadiums like that while some NRL fans are suggesting that someone should play at NSO, our ambition knows no bounds lol.
Honestly only one stadium should have been state funded and that was ANZ’s original billion dollar plan. Retractable roof, great rake, club mode, connected by west metro line. Souths, Dogs, Parra and Tigers all could have used it considering the transportation link. Burwood North is just 200m away from Tigers’ 50m centre and cafe area that’s being built and like Parra only two stops off ANZ and five minutes away. But instead we built in Parra for the Eels and a dying aleague club and now clubs like Tigers and Dogs are coming out with cap in hand asking for hundreds of millions of dollars in stadium infrastructure all because they didn’t get a centralised stadium. If the state government follows through with what V’landys wants we’re gonna be spending the same amount of money but be much poorer when it comes to quality of stadia and ability to host major events. Absolutely tragic outcome that.
Or maybe we just have our own culture and our own way of doing things?
European cities don’t just take out bulldozers to knock down heritage buildings so they can put up a shitty Meriton Tower.
There are different values to different things and they can coexist.
If a rebuilt rectangular ANZ with world class features and a 26 billion dollar transportation link can’t get decent looking crowds for clubs that either have played there for almost 20 years or are based within ten minutes east and west of it then we have major issues as a sport.Couldnt disagree more. ANZ is never going to be good for club games no matter how much lipstick you slap on that pig. Four 30k stadiums in Sydney for its rectangular sports clubs should be the goal, sadly neither the Govts thinking, or Vlandys, will deliver that.
Playing in "boutique" lol grounds with 18k capacities. Small minded is probably what Id call it. The game sadly still thinks its a suburban local sydney comp watched by 10k people.
18k isn’t a small crowd.
There are probably thousands of stadiums around the world that host national competition teams of similar size.
But none of that really matters. If we were the only competition in the world doing it, it would still be ok. Who f**king cares if people enjoy it? It’s our f**king game and we can enjoy it how we choose. If you prefer the way the other game does things go follow that.
You can if you get the size right. That is the key to a successful stadium. Your boy West Coast averaged over 95% capacity (40k) at their old stadium. There were calls to make Optus 80k as they could fill that for big games, it they made it 60k and have averaged about 90% of capacity the past two seasons. You have to make the stadium small enough that it is hard to get a ticket. This turns fans into members and members into reserved seat holders. I know West Coast are the biggest football club in the country and not a fair comparison with Sydney RL clubs, but the principles are the same.You cant get an 18k crowd avg with a 18k capacity stadium! You are never going to fill it for every game.
You can if you get the size right. That is the key to a successful stadium. Your boy West Coast averaged over 95% capacity (40k) at their old stadium. There were calls to make Optus 80k as they could fill that for big games, it they made it 60k and have averaged about 90% of capacity the past two seasons. You have to make the stadium small enough that it is hard to get a ticket. This turns fans into members and members into reserved seat holders. I know West Coast are the biggest football club in the country and not a fair comparison with Sydney RL clubs, but the principles are the same.
If a club is averaging 12k in an average season, 18k sounds about right for a new or upgraded stadium. Build the stadium for the average size crowd. AAMI Park should have been 22k-25k. Would have made for a better atmosphere as it is usually half empty.