As an 'old school' Dragons fan, I don't rate the golden point rule.
Give 'Golden point' the boot.
As an 'old school' Dragons fan, I don't rate the golden point rule.
What is wrong with a draw.
Two teams battling it out for a well earned draw!
One point is better than none.
Teams having had draws add a new / old, dimension to the ladder which is not a bad thing.
Yes, I'm old fashion, yes, I'm a baby boomer ............... and dam proud of it, just like my team, just like our older system of allowing for draws.
it ain't so bad people.
Even Gus likes the old system ........... and so should we all.
Golden point, in all it's format, is in contrast of the game we love.
Give 'Golden point' the boot.
I'm not in favour of Golden Point, however, it looks like it's here to stay.
If they were to change it somewhat just so a result could be achieved then I would go this way and it does follow what the finals Golden Point looks like:
1. 10 mins extra time, not olden Point. Team with the highest score wins. If still locked up then
2. 5 mins Golden Point: if teams still locked up then
3. Share points
Lol, that's a golden point Eatons Hill Dragon.The best thing about last nights Golden Point is the Broncos lost
Baby boomers don't have a monopoly on common sense.As an 'old school' Dragons fan, I don't rate the golden point rule.
What is wrong with a draw.
Two teams battling it out for a well earned draw!
One point is better than none.
Teams having had draws add a new / old, dimension to the ladder which is not a bad thing.
Yes, I'm old fashion, yes, I'm a baby boomer ............... and dam proud of it, just like my team, just like our older system of allowing for draws.
it ain't so bad people.
Even Gus likes the old system ........... and so should we all.
Golden point, in all it's format, is in contrast of the game we love.
Give 'Golden point' the boot.