What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Great aticle Sean - on Big Footy too!

j5o6hn

Juniors
Messages
2,013
So Monty your a code historian like Sean are you,or are you just another what are Journalists above these days Car Salesmen or night cart men.
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
North of the Vic/NSW Border a football/sports historian researches and studies all codes of football and other sports.

In Victoria, a sports historian researches AFL and maybe cricket.

In regards to All codes of football in Australia, Victorians are stupid. They know little about the other codes and have no interest in learning about them.

I work with people down here who hate league. They call it Rugby because they don't realise that there's two rugby codes, nor do they understand the difference between the two.

They invited me to watch an AFL game recently. I went along, watched the game, knew a bit about it, found it to be bearable.

Do you think they'll come to a Rugby League game ? hahaha f**k no. Why?

Because they are dumb idiots. They call 'Rugby' a game full of 'shirtlifters', the same people who support a game where tackling below the waist is considered tripping and thus illegal.

A game where any late contact, no matter how accidental or unavoidable, is penalised severely by the other side receiving a 50 metre penalty

A game where they physically scuffle each others shirts as they are too pissweak scared to throw a punch. When they do throw a punch, it's when one of the other players isn't looking.

A game where they wear little poofy singlets and little girly shorts.

A game created so as to prevent physical contact as much as possible by allowing players to run, kick and pass the ball in any direction they want on a much bigger ground than all over football codes.

Lets face it, AFL is good for a laugh, but if you want to watch real sport, you watch any other code of football.

AFL Fans will never accept any other code of football. They are deluded beyond belief and scared sh*tless about other football codes taking over their game. So much so, their even more pathetic and blatantly sh*thouse sports writers and media intentionally railroad any other football code, give it minimal to no airplay or space on TV, Radio or in print.

There's no such thing as a sports journalist in Victoria.

Melbourne is also bullsh*tting when it calls itself the sporting capital of Australia. You'd think to be the sporting capital, you'd need to do more than have teams in all competitions, you actually have to support it as well. Victorians don't support other sports anything like other states do.

Victorian sports writers are f**kwits and dumb f**ks who pull their collective dicks over some scrawny softcock AFL player who managed to run away from 37 other scrawny softcocks for 80 minutes, all white throwing a ball away quickly or kicking it in no pre-defined direction as quickly as possible so as to avoid any physical contact.
 

m0nty

Juniors
Messages
633
So Monty your a code historian like Sean are you,or are you just another what are Journalists above these days Car Salesmen or night cart men.

I'm a bit different. I'm even more disreputable than a journalist these days. The AFL hates me, that's all that's relevant here.
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
did you commit the ultimate sin and use the word Rugby in an article.
 

RL1908

Bench
Messages
2,717
North of the Vic/NSW Border a football/sports historian researches and studies all codes of football and other sports.

It's something to do with RL I think - the code has always been competing with other codes its entire existence, meaning anyone looking at its history (and pre-history) is going to become hyper-aware of the broader sports world that RL exists in. Many RL fans are also just as aware of the game's context amidst other codes. Tony Collins is the same in the UK - he writes & comments on all codes http://rugbyreloaded.blogspot.com/ So we find that RL writers end up telling the story that RU writers & historians should, but seem disinterested in doing - The Rugby Rebellion and A Social History of Rugby Union.
 

bobmar28

Bench
Messages
4,304
I'm watching the Sunday Footy Show and I have to say I object to the use of the Brut advertisement featuring the Sherrin ball. That ad used to use a Steeden when shown on an NRL program.
 

RL1908

Bench
Messages
2,717
I wrote that...
http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/...game-of-mumfriendly-soccer-20100612-y4r1.html

Indeed, in commenting upon Cronulla fullback Nathan Gardner's incredible length-of-the-field solo try, the ABC's Melbourne-centric Offsiders panel chuckled in half-seriousness that "anybody can do that if you don't have to bounce the ball all the way".

Perhaps we should recall that in 1866 the need to bounce the ball (which wasn't particularly easy on uneven ground with a misshaped ball) was added to Australian rules to make it practically impossible to venture off on a long run while holding the ball instead of kicking it.

Nowadays, AFL players are so proficient at bouncing the ball, and run with the Sherrin so frequently and far, that William Webb Ellis would have willingly joined in.

Bouncing the ball is now nothing more than a superfluous show, rather than an impediment meant to stop players from haring off on a ''rugby run''.

The AFL world is in raptures over Buddy Franklin's two goals last weekend, both of which came after long runs carrying/bouncing the ball:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEKu6Bnpn8A

Apparently these two goals provide confirmation that I'm wrong and that the need to bounce the ball makes the run superior to anything seen in RL - yet, if the AFL rules didn't require Franklin to have to bounce the ball, what would be any different from what eventuated? A: nothing. If Franklin didn't have to bounce the ball those runs and goals would have looked exactly the same.
 
Last edited:

Loudstrat

Coach
Messages
15,224
Yep. we shouldnt have to chase them. And the NRL will not chase them.
Which also means. More stars in the future will go. Potentialy Greg Inglis is the next.

If he goes to AFL he's a bigger hypocrite that whoever put the words "Queensland" and "Origin" together. I mean, he can NEVER forgive Joey for those remarks and will leave the code that made him to deal with the smear of racism - by going to a code that in the last 2 weeks has not only proven to be homophobic, but also labelled his kin as "cannibals".

We all know he's as loyal as Terry Hill at contract negotiation time. And the poor old NSWRL seems to be the only sporting body honouring the truth about players heritage. Heck, The AFL are promoting Folau as Western Sydney's kid when he played for everyone who wanted to smash anyone from Western Sydney. Then on the weekend that other bastion of rep integrity - the Pommy Union side - selected Shanteyne Harpe (spelling??) - who couldn't be more kiwi if he was blind, covered in feathers and sniffed the ground!
 

Latest posts

Top