Freddo said:the thnig with all 3 is that there all different styles of players. like in defence there all pretty safe at the back but in attack there all different. mullins scored tries from anywhere in his prime he was blessed with speed to burn. belchar was good from within the 30ms of the line and choc is good in broken field.
you forgot mick adolus off the list too
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: X 100 000 000Kris_man said:one thing abut Mullins: i don't think i've seen anyone, ever, as good as him under the high ball. an absolute freakazoid.
#-o #-o #-o i'll wait for further opinion on this matter, i still think he was awesome, the best (under the high ball).Raider_Azz said::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: X 100 000 000Kris_man said:one thing abut Mullins: i don't think i've seen anyone, ever, as good as him under the high ball. an absolute freakazoid.
You're kidding, right? Mullins was TERRIBLE under the high ball. Especially in his last few years for us.
Kris_man said:#-o #-o #-o i'll wait for further opinion on this matter, i still think he was awesome, the best (under the high ball).Raider_Azz said::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: X 100 000 000Kris_man said:one thing abut Mullins: i don't think i've seen anyone, ever, as good as him under the high ball. an absolute freakazoid.
You're kidding, right? Mullins was TERRIBLE under the high ball. Especially in his last few years for us.
Terrible was a bit of an overstatement, but he certaintely wasn't great IMO.Greenblooded said:Actually I don't think he was terrible,just not great