What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hayne~NFL~RU~Tits~Eels~Dad~Jailed~Mistrial~Jailed~Retrial~Jailed~Appeal~Quashed-Sued~Fat Coach

Eelogical

Referee
Messages
23,331
I think I've made my position clear on the reports of his possible homecoming. Clarification for those who don't know where I stand, I 'm against it. However, I'll accept the decision as a supporter of the Eels if he comes back and along with that, hope there is healthy competition for team positions with a common goal of winning a title. I'm not going to lie, I want team Eels, not team Hayne.
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
I don't believe BA would have spoken to the press about another clubs player.
BA may not have spoken to the press.... all sorts of people speak to the press.

But maybe BA has spoken to Hayne's manager when approached, and maybe he gave an indication of a potential laying position? If so... the leaks are back!
 

emjaycee

Coach
Messages
13,828
1. Too much...?
2. Whereever he's told to, if the reason for signing Hayne comes from club admin more than an actual squad need...?

Mate, in all seriousness, do you actually read your responses and think they add value to the thread before you hit the "Post Reply" button?

I asked the first question because you had already claimed his asking price was too much and yet you answered with the same claim you had already made and simply added a "?" at the end.
If you know how much he is asking you could simply state a number, and if not then a "No" would have been the correct answer.

And do you really think that Bernie or the Board would dictate to BA where to play a player and that BA would simply agree to this? Where have you been since 2014?
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
Mate, in all seriousness, do you actually read your responses and think they add value to the thread before you hit the "Post Reply" button?

I asked the first question because you had already claimed his asking price was too much and yet you answered with the same claim you had already made and simply added a "?" at the end.
If you know how much he is asking you could simply state a number, and if not then a "No" would have been the correct answer.

And do you really think that Bernie or the Board would dictate to BA where to play a player and that BA would simply agree to this? Where have you been since 2014?
To answer your questions:
1. Yes
2. Yes, while BA is under contract
3. Various places, but ended up in Cessnock

And to put some questions to you, in all seriousnes...:
Why the need to explain the reasons behind your questions when they've been answered?
Why so serious all the time on the forums?
Who are you to be the arbiter of what objectively "adds value" or what is a "correct answer"?

Go Parra (and Jarryd, if he comes).
 

emjaycee

Coach
Messages
13,828
And to put some questions to you, in all seriousnes...:
Why the need to explain the reasons behind your questions when they've been answered?
Why so serious all the time on the forums?
Who are you to be the arbiter of what objectively "adds value" or what is a "correct answer"?

Go Parra (and Jarryd, if he comes).

If my question had been answered I wouldn't have needed to explain the reasons behind it.
Not always serious mate, just most of the time.
Surely I am able to judge the value of answers to questions I ask, given I am the one seeking the answer.

Go Jarryd (and Parra if he comes).
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
62,923
If playing centres and off form 500k is about right.
Titans would be better to lose 400k and save 800k. Still puts them 300k infront.
 

Latest posts

Top