Avenger
Immortal
- Messages
- 34,046
He comes across as being as sharp as one of Hayne’s houso mates.Agreed. His comments are embarrassing.
He comes across as being as sharp as one of Hayne’s houso mates.Agreed. His comments are embarrassing.
I never said that. Where is the actual proof that she actually said no. Nobody heard it, nobody saw it. No admissions on the phone taps and no witnesses. Medical evidence of a cut on the privates. I don't know whether Hayne is guilty or not. I just don't like the fact that anyone can be sent down on another person's say-so. It seems that juries are content to go with most likely rather than reasonable doubt. Not good.
Some people struggle with concept of consent. He may well be on a steep learning curve in Silverwater Jail.
No confusion with De Belin. He's been charged with oral, vaginal and anal rape.Perhaps you should research what constitutes sex under the Crimes Act before making further comments.
Agreed. This simple video helps the hard of learning…
No confusion with De Belin. He's been charged with oral, vaginal and anal rape.
Liar. That’s how Mik got his four years.I've never met anyone who has said make me a cup of tea and then upon the arrival decided they don't want the tea.
This video is ridiculous.
Who pours tea? You sip it ffs.
Anyhows on that note I am going to make myself a cup of tea.
Has anyone called you a teapot ?I've never met anyone who has said make me a cup of tea and then upon the arrival decided they don't want the tea.
This video is ridiculous.
Who pours tea? You sip it ffs.
Anyhows on that note I am going to make myself a cup of tea.
Not guilty or 2nd mistrial ? Later if anything.I reckon he will be found not guitly
Latter if anything.Not guilty or 2nd mistrial ? Later if anything.
Tony needs to work on he's grammar
Well, he's in a good place right now to find out whether or not he likes it.... May not be as suppressed by the time Bubba finishes with him....There are discussions amongst some Sydney journalists as to whether Hayne has issues with suppressed homo-sexuality. Purely speculative of course.
Tony needs to work on he's grammar
That's really fantastic. You still don't know what she did or didn't agree to. Nobody except for two people know. One says I wanted nothing, the other emphatically says otherwise.I think you'll find that attempting to stimulate a woman's genitals without a penis involved counts as having sex. Ask any lesbian. Therefore saying no to sex means no to sexual contact. I understand in reality there's a continuum (the American high school movie four bases system) but legally, once you hear no you need to wind it back to zero or you're committing a crime.
Plenty of women won't even say no when they don't want to have sex. How strongly must they be feeling about it when they do say no?
*His from mintoHe’s from Minto mate, he thinks Grammar is his mum’s mum.
No need. The point you merkins don't get is nobody knows what she didn't consent too. Two people which happen to be the only ones that know have vastly different stories.Perhaps you should research what constitutes sex under the Crimes Act before making further comments.
That's really fantastic. You still don't know what she did or didn't agree to. Nobody except for two people know. One says I wanted nothing, the other emphatically says otherwise.
That's the problem right there. 12 people ticking the box on most likely rather than looking at what constitutes reasonable doubt.They got ten independent people to come to a unanimous decision he was guilty mate. It wasn’t a coin toss.
If there's reasonable doubt then the accused should walk.welcome to the judicial system. That’s why we have some guilty people walking the streets, and some innocent people in jail.
the system is flawed but it’s the best one there is. Far better a jury of the community have to make a unanimous (generally) decision than just one judge being the be all and end all decision maker.
If there's reasonable doubt then the accused should walk.