Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 92,073
He is a proper fat merkin.Jarryd looks more like a bovine. Needs to lay off the KFC.
He is a proper fat merkin.Jarryd looks more like a bovine. Needs to lay off the KFC.
He is a proper fat merkin.
They were together as a couple weren't they, at the time he went to this bucks party in Newcastle and dropped in for his daytime booty call on the way back to Sydney?
I thought they were ‘only just friends’ by the time she had his baby.They were together as a couple weren't they, at the time he went to this bucks party in Newcastle and dropped in for his daytime booty call on the way back to Sydney?
Nope. They were not together at that point.They were together as a couple weren't they, at the time he went to this bucks party in Newcastle and dropped in for his daytime booty call on the way back to Sydney?
He looks Parra Fit to me....He could be suffering from middle age spread
Front runner. Chew up the hard yardsHe looks Parra Fit to me....
I agree with most of this except that the last bit is purely just her version. He says he did hang around enough time to see she was okay (there's some bit in earlier trials about a $50 bill he finds after she comes out of bathroom and thinks it is hers and she tries then to insinuate it was a bribe - but Hayne ends up taking it...hahahaha).I think it is kind of obvious what's happened.
He seen her as some sort of sex doll for him to get off with.
She seen him as a potential BF and probably had little idea how to get his attention bar using her body to lure him.
He rocks up and she starts to realise how he views her so becomes turned off.
Hayne has come all this way and wants something for his time. Entitled and hoarny.
I doubt he forcefully ripped her clothes off like a savage beast. Most likely just an awkward situation. And had he not cut her this all blows over. Actually even if he put some effort after what had happened she probably doesn't pursue any of this.
The least the merkin could of done is helped her out at the time or checked if she was ok/ asked her to let him know if needs anything etc. Sounds like a massive dickhead
I'd say thats the bit of detail the racist judge excluded and the higher court went "wooah wait a minute".Alleged victim of Jarryd Hayne sent another man texts on the same day, court told
‘I’ll say yes to Hayne’: Accuser’s text to other man on day of alleged sexual assaultwww.foxsports.com.au
Yeah, it's a weird one.This is where privacy is at odds with standards of evidence, much like how 'believe accusers' is at odds with the presumption of innocence.
Yes, those messages were allowed as evidence in the first trial, but the second trial judge did not allow them - and that was one of the two successful (out of four) grounds for a retrial.I'd say thats the bit of detail the ------ judge excluded and the higher court went "wooah wait a minute".
If Hayne is found not guilty, it doesn't automatially mean the other party is a false allegationist.Yeah, it's a weird one.
She stands accused in a "he said" of being a false allegationist (if found guilty of that she should do 5 years inside I'd reckon) so all this privacy about her is prejudicial against the alleged victim of the false allegation - Hayne.
We don't even know the alleged false allegationists name (doesn't sell newspapers I suppose).