Do you honestly believe that is worth dropping him over?!
Yes. Wouldn't have said it otherwise.
As people are saying here and in other threads, there is something wrong in the club things year affecting performances, the club clearly haven't got to the bottom of it, and Jarryd's effort would no doubt have created some extra work early this week in terms of morale and explanations and making sooky la la come to terms with his selection on the wing - that's extra work that could have been spent on better things in terms of the first grade squad's prpearation this week.
You'd make a mighty dictator. Well done.
Not wanting to dictate anything, would just be wanting to be a coach that get to the bottom of the bad attitudes that have been plaguing us on-field this year... Hayne's quotes were roundly condemned by commentators on NRL Teams on Fox this evening too, so I know I'm not going out on a limb with this view that he stuffed up here?
...and therein lies the problem. If we were conversing face to face, you wouldnt have that attitude. Or you probably wouldnt get far in life.
What attitude? If this was a face to face discussion I would have walked away long ago when things started to get silly - but here I'm simply responding when you (or RJ) have directly dealt that sh*t up, instead of discussed the issues re hayne. You're the one carrying on like I'm committing heresy for saying that Hayne shouldn't have went to the media before his coach with those statements. And you're also the one that started trying to put other words in my mouth and making personal judegements, just because I have a different point of view to yours?
Won't even respond to the bit where you start passing judgement on how far I'll get in life, that's just laughable :lol:.
Dogmatic: Characterized by an authoritative, arrogant assertion of unproved or unprovable principles.
It's just an opinion mate. If you don't share it, that's fine.
I don't think anyone has to prove their opinions here, so the whole definition of the intended insult is irrelevent. But if you question and challenge someone's opinion in the way you and RJ went about doing so in this thread, then a person has a right to give answers of the fashion I've given - however you choose to interpret that is up to you. Again, I thought this thread was about Jarryd Hayne, not about me responding to childish personal comments?