titoelcolombiano
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,675
Rugby League internationals rate really well in TV in Australia. The Kangaroos rate better than the Wallabies and better than Socceroos and Matildas non world cup internationals.
For that matter games involving the Kiwis, Tonga and Samoa rate really well too. In fact the Pacific Championship game between Fiji and PNG last year outdated the Bledisloe.
I believe that when the England RL team gets on FTA TV in the UK, they rate pretty well, much more than any Superleague club game can rate, meaning the national side has the ability to reach more viewers.
We've seen the Islanders in NZ go crazy for the Tonga and Samoa sides and to a slightly lesser extend (oddly) the Kiwis.
There's clearly interest in international games and tournaments. So the question is, why aren't the crowds there? Don't get me wrong, last year's Pacific Championships crowds were impressive and the upcoming Ashes looks like it will be the highest attended ever, but why can't the Kangaroos pull 52k to Suncorp, 90k to the MCG and (likely) 80k to Accor like the Wallabies can?
Why can't the Kangaroos v Kiwis which soundly beats the RU version of the rivalry in TV ratings and is arguably more competitive, draw Bledisloe level attendances? Meaning, pretty much an instant sell-out anywhere in Australia or New Zealand.
I hear non Union and Soccer fans say that they attend Wallabies, the Socceroos or the Matildas matches, not because they love that sport, but because they love their country and want to support the team that represents the country. So why doesn't this automatically apply to the Kangaroos too that based on TV ratings are just as popular with arguably as much or more star power in the Australian market than any of those teams?
Common reasons given are:
Scheduling and promotion: Yep, I can see it being somewhat of an issue, we still don't have a Pacific Championship schedule and it supposedly starts in 3 months. But the world cup doesn't suffer from that issue and attendances aren't much better for that tournament than the Pacific Championships.
Competition: I don't see it. The Australia v NZ rivalry has been more competitive in RL than it has been in RU for about 20 years at this point. Tonga has beaten NZ in 2017 and Australia and GB in 2019. Fiji beat NZ in 2017 and pushes them hard at the 2022 WC and Samoa have beaten England at the 2022 WC. Both Samoa and Tonga are much stronger today than they were then.
England/GB has not beaten Australia since 2006 but it's not like they are getting lapped either. The last time they played was the 2017 WC Final (not acceptable, way too long between games) and England lost by 6. St Helens and Wigan have shown against Penrith that whilst the depth isn't there, England have enough top end talent at home and enough players running around the NRL to remain reasonably competitive.
If you include England as outsiders, you have 5 teams that could win the World Cup next year, and God knows who will win the Pacific Championships this year. Plus if the PNG NRL team develops local talent like we all hope it will, you can make that 6 teams.
Not having a regular calendar of events:
I don't buy this one either...
2004: Tri Nations
2005: Tri Nations
2006: Tri Nations
2007: Kiwis toured England
2008: World Cup
2009: 4 Nations
2010: 4 Nations
2011: 4 Nations
2012: Autumn International Series (Europe)
2013: World Cup
2014: 4 Nations
2015: Kiwis toured England
2016: 4 Nations
2017: World Cup
2018: Kiwis toured England
2019: Oceania Cup / Lions tour of NZ & Pacific
2020 & 2021: COVID
2022: World Cup
2023: Pacific Championships/Tonga toured England
2024: Pacific Championships/Samoa toured England
2025: Pacific Championships/Ashes
2026: World Cup
So what is it then? Is purely down to more promotion? It's not like any Rugby League fan can say they don't know either the Pacific Championships or the World Cup are on. Why the lack of enthusiasm for mainly Kangaroos (in terms of crowds) but international RL in general when clearly there is interest there.
For that matter games involving the Kiwis, Tonga and Samoa rate really well too. In fact the Pacific Championship game between Fiji and PNG last year outdated the Bledisloe.
I believe that when the England RL team gets on FTA TV in the UK, they rate pretty well, much more than any Superleague club game can rate, meaning the national side has the ability to reach more viewers.
We've seen the Islanders in NZ go crazy for the Tonga and Samoa sides and to a slightly lesser extend (oddly) the Kiwis.
There's clearly interest in international games and tournaments. So the question is, why aren't the crowds there? Don't get me wrong, last year's Pacific Championships crowds were impressive and the upcoming Ashes looks like it will be the highest attended ever, but why can't the Kangaroos pull 52k to Suncorp, 90k to the MCG and (likely) 80k to Accor like the Wallabies can?
Why can't the Kangaroos v Kiwis which soundly beats the RU version of the rivalry in TV ratings and is arguably more competitive, draw Bledisloe level attendances? Meaning, pretty much an instant sell-out anywhere in Australia or New Zealand.
I hear non Union and Soccer fans say that they attend Wallabies, the Socceroos or the Matildas matches, not because they love that sport, but because they love their country and want to support the team that represents the country. So why doesn't this automatically apply to the Kangaroos too that based on TV ratings are just as popular with arguably as much or more star power in the Australian market than any of those teams?
Common reasons given are:
Scheduling and promotion: Yep, I can see it being somewhat of an issue, we still don't have a Pacific Championship schedule and it supposedly starts in 3 months. But the world cup doesn't suffer from that issue and attendances aren't much better for that tournament than the Pacific Championships.
Competition: I don't see it. The Australia v NZ rivalry has been more competitive in RL than it has been in RU for about 20 years at this point. Tonga has beaten NZ in 2017 and Australia and GB in 2019. Fiji beat NZ in 2017 and pushes them hard at the 2022 WC and Samoa have beaten England at the 2022 WC. Both Samoa and Tonga are much stronger today than they were then.
England/GB has not beaten Australia since 2006 but it's not like they are getting lapped either. The last time they played was the 2017 WC Final (not acceptable, way too long between games) and England lost by 6. St Helens and Wigan have shown against Penrith that whilst the depth isn't there, England have enough top end talent at home and enough players running around the NRL to remain reasonably competitive.
If you include England as outsiders, you have 5 teams that could win the World Cup next year, and God knows who will win the Pacific Championships this year. Plus if the PNG NRL team develops local talent like we all hope it will, you can make that 6 teams.
Not having a regular calendar of events:
I don't buy this one either...
2004: Tri Nations
2005: Tri Nations
2006: Tri Nations
2007: Kiwis toured England
2008: World Cup
2009: 4 Nations
2010: 4 Nations
2011: 4 Nations
2012: Autumn International Series (Europe)
2013: World Cup
2014: 4 Nations
2015: Kiwis toured England
2016: 4 Nations
2017: World Cup
2018: Kiwis toured England
2019: Oceania Cup / Lions tour of NZ & Pacific
2020 & 2021: COVID
2022: World Cup
2023: Pacific Championships/Tonga toured England
2024: Pacific Championships/Samoa toured England
2025: Pacific Championships/Ashes
2026: World Cup
So what is it then? Is purely down to more promotion? It's not like any Rugby League fan can say they don't know either the Pacific Championships or the World Cup are on. Why the lack of enthusiasm for mainly Kangaroos (in terms of crowds) but international RL in general when clearly there is interest there.