What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How many teams should be in the RLWC?

playdaball

Bench
Messages
3,525
I reckon 8-10 teams:

Australia
Nz
Tonga
Fiji
PNG
Samoa
France
GREAT BRITAN
Plus other others?

Runnng a developing nations WC at the same time?
 

parrawentyfan

Juniors
Messages
745
16. The current 14 plus 2 others.
- Cook Islands
- Canada / Jamaica / Serbia etc

Keep the GB nations separate. It gives us incentive to develop the game in places other than just England.
 

Greenstar5

Juniors
Messages
36
Should be 16 teams. 4 groups of 4 teams.
Top 2 from each group progress.

Nations like Canada should be at this WC, since they are hosting it in 8 years.
 

Force

Juniors
Messages
343
The one thing International Rugby League dont want to do is go backwards. Cutting the tournament to 8 teams is a huge step backwards. As mentioned above, expand to 16 teams consisting of 4 pools of 4 teams with the top 2 from each qualifying for the quarters. Case closed.
 

jim_57

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
4,626
16 teams and stick with that for the foreseeable future.

Eventually work towards an even pool structure with 2 from each pool going to the quarters. Another format that could be a step towards 2-2-2-2 could be 3-2-2-1 with 1 Super Pool, and 1 weaker pool with only 1 qualifier.

Crossover games need to go as someone is always going to get the raw end.
 

Pommy

Coach
Messages
14,657
Should be 16 teams. 4 groups of 4 teams.
Top 2 from each group progress.

Nations like Canada should be at this WC, since they are hosting it in 8 years.

Well the should have qualified then. You don’t get FIFA making it a stipulation that teams qualify prior to hosting. For instance South Africa hosted in 2010 but weren’t there in 2006.

I think it’s time we go to 16 teams but is nobody worried that the group stages are going to be pretty shit? If we seed England, Australia, NZ and presumably Tonga in to different groups then there’s the potential for none of them to meet until the semis and we’re not blessed with enough quality to make the preceding rounds that interesting.
For credibility the groups would need to be done by random so we might not get interesting games like Tonga v Samoa, Australia vs Lebanon, England v France.
 

Dakink

Bench
Messages
3,135
Im also im favour of 16 with 4 pools of 4 - top 2 moving through.

Top 4 seeded... based on last world cup unless a proper international calendar can be organised.

Rest of pools random draw. I realise this may leave some mismatches so would also be in favour of top 8 being seeded.

Allows more nations a realistic chance of qualifying and will also enncourage more developing nations just to attempt to qualify which will only improve the standard of developing nations as they play more internationals.
 

Irish-bulldog

Juniors
Messages
785
Im also im favour of 16 with 4 pools of 4 - top 2 moving through.

Top 4 seeded... based on last world cup unless a proper international calendar can be organised.

Rest of pools random draw. I realise this may leave some mismatches so would also be in favour of top 8 being seeded.

Allows more nations a realistic chance of qualifying and will also enncourage more developing nations just to attempt to qualify which will only improve the standard of developing nations as they play more internationals.
Absolutely perfect setup.
 
Top