Masoe_eats_babies
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,364
Same as Burns last year
I mentioned that, then I forgot this is the NRL. It doesn't matter. I think at the judiciary hearings they pull the result out of a hat.
Same as Burns last year
As much as I hate the shoulder charge ban you have to laugh at the NRL logic. JWH was red carded and is likely to be suspended for what was an accidental high shot in which George Rose practically fell into him.
Then you have Billy Slater, with about his 10th out and out shoulder charge this season, who's also kicked somebody in the face, and he's escaped charge for this.
Accidental high tackles = red card and suspension.
Intentional, REPEATED, shoulder charges = no charge and only a caution on the field
I missed the Storm Panthers game but was Slater penalised for that?
You saw a shoulder charge of the type the rule was implemented to prevent did you . . . dear o f**king dear.
Every bit of contact was made with the upper arm
No, he was given a warning if I remember rightly.
To compound the issue, he's been shoulder charging all year, it's not as if it's a one off thing, he already knocked out that Cowboys player earlier in the year with a shoulder charge.
Earlier in the Panthers game he shoulder charged Segeyaro too!
A JWH, Matai, Pritchard would be spending serious time on the sidelines if they repeatedly ignored the new shoulder charge rule and went about throwing themselves into people every other game like that
You can't penalise Slater because the try was scored and you couldn't put him on report as there was no contact with the head either. If he had knocked him into touch I have no doubt it would be a penalty try
You can't penalise Slater because the try was scored and you couldn't put him on report as there was no contact with the head either. If he had knocked him into touch I have no doubt it would be a penalty try
You can't penalise Slater because the try was scored and you couldn't put him on report as there was no contact with the head either. If he had knocked him into touch I have no doubt it would be a penalty try
Some of you blokes need to visit a physio, learn the difference between tricep/bicept and shoulder
Some of you blokes need to visit a physio, learn the difference between tricep/bicept and shoulder
The human anatomy has f**k all to do with it. We're talking about the rules of rugby league. The rules of rugby league state that what Slater did is a shoulder charge, the rules of rugby league also state that the shoulder charge is illegal.
But if you want to be a pedantic merkin I'm fairly certain he made a bit of contact round about his greater tubercle :sarcasm:
No contact with the shoulder at all, but wtf, I make few posts compared to most on this forum and I'm just trying to get off the bench . . . what better place than a school for the blind