Danish
Referee
- Messages
- 32,019
Was he going to feed them one of Gallens eyes ?
He might have been trying to open up poor Gal's peripheral vision so he can actually see there are other players he can pass to when he runs?
Was he going to feed them one of Gallens eyes ?
Who cares. The suspension will be served during the trials.
He might have been trying to open up poor Gal's peripheral vision so he can actually see there are other players he can pass to when he runs?
Disgusting eye gouge. 4-6 weeks.
Fair enough, maybe longer
Should have been a send off.
I just saw it.....it looks like there was some intent in that.
So you know what players intentions are for each tackle? :lol:I've re watched it too. There wasn't intent. A definite accident.
Gallen did a swinging arm high shot on Grevsmuhl in the first 30secs yet there was no penalty/report. There was intent in it and it was dangerous from Gallen. Definitely on purpose from Gallen wanting to hurt Grevsmuhl.
Gallen should get charged by the judiciary but Gallen is a protected species!!!
So you know what players intentions are for each tackle? :lol:
Pretty funny that a South Sydney player eye gouging is a 'definite accident' yet a high tackle is 'definitely on purpose' when it's the other team. :sarcasm: