Belly in Brisvegas
Coach
- Messages
- 11,124
You would have been had it been Folau....;-)
Nah we would have just soldiered on and won it...it's what Queenslanders do! ;-)
You would have been had it been Folau....;-)
Nah we would have just soldiered on and won it...it's what Queenslanders do! ;-)
Can't wait to catch up with you Belly.
I'm going to punch you in the head.
Suity
It's big enough, you wont miss it. Just be careful, it's full of that much air, it might pop.
Harrigan really lost the plot last night. For mine, the decision wasn't in the spirit of the game. The game was being televised to a wide audience and, as Sterlo said, most of the 2M punters who watched last night hardly ever turn on the NRL. D!ckhead.
You would have been had it been Folau....;-)
I'll ask you this Colonel, would the BOOKIE have refunded the coin if it was Folau?
Raises an issue of integrity if the situation was reversed and Qld-ers had their money invested with Mark Read.
I don't think the photographic evidence proves it one way or the other but it leans more to him being out.
I'll ask you this Colonel, would the BOOKIE have refunded the coin if it was Folau?
Raises an issue of integrity if the situation was reversed and Qld-ers had their money invested with Mark Read.
Yep. The more that comes up on this matter the more it shows Bill Harrigan to have been correct.
</H1>Benefit of the doubt made clearer by NRL
A more liberal interpretation of the benefit of the doubt rule by video referees is set to result in an increase in the number of tries awarded during the 2009 NRL season.
While no rule change has been implemented by the NRL, an adjustment in thinking will see the onus of proof swing in favour of the tryscorer.
Rather than looking for a reason to award the try, the man in the box will instead look for a reason not to give the try, with any benefit of the doubt to favour the attacker.
Were looking at the rules of the game and using them and saying `well what has he done wrong, what rule has he not abided in scoring that try, referees boss Robert Finch said.
When you score a try in possession of the football, the rule book talks about placing the ball on the ground with your hand or hands.
It doesnt mention control, it doesnt mention downward pressure - so when were adjudicating on a try, were not considering control or downward pressure because the rulebook doesnt state that.
For us to take the try off them, they need to have broken a rule.
If we cant the clarify (whether a rule has been broken) or `geez Im not sure, I think he had his hand on the ball or I think its downward pressure, well give the try.
Yep. The more that comes up on this matter the more it shows Bill Harrigan to have been correct.
At the end of the day "The King" said it was a try last night during the telecast. So Harrigan must have been wrong, as "The King" is always right isn't he Belly?
TBQH, I would have probably given it.
I just wonder if this much noise would be made if NSW won.
For sure.
Sorry to clarify....I wonder if Mark Read would have made this noise. Not the first time a try hasn't been given.