I think people should stop quoting and RL stats during the 1996 to 1999 period
The fan base and sponsor base was fed up with SL greed
Club profits were incorrectly propped up by News Ltd buyouts
Eg in 1995 Cronulla was bust and being run into the ground
Souths actually made the criteria cutoff but the NRL rejected a sponsorship deal they had in place. But it meant no Penrith. Souths were unlucky that the 1985-89 period wasnt be used as a measure rather than a rebuilding period impacted by the SL War
Balmain actually made the cut too
That would have meant Norths and Wests as the two clubs to miss out
Easts benefited by not having juniors in the criteria
While today membership not just LC asset base is a valuable criteria item
But take the $10 mil grant from ANY club and it will struggle financial in a few years
Some excellent points! Even the so called "desired number" of 14 was wrong. Wonder how the competition would be fairing if 20 clubs were at play after the 'so called' deal in 1997? I'm suggesting it (the NRL) would be dominating Australia wide by now. To think that the criteria had no room for junior numbers! Astounding!
Last edited: