Frank_Grimes
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,023
MIXED POSITONS
SLATER - specialist fullback who played many origins on the wing
Slater can't be included in that group. He only ever played 3 origin matches on the wing. 2 off the bench.
MIXED POSITONS
SLATER - specialist fullback who played many origins on the wing
Slater can't be included in that group. He only ever played 3 origin matches on the wing. 2 off the bench.
Barba allegedly belted his missus and she left him and he wanted to reconcile.
Jamal's mother is very ill.
2 different scenarios.
Penrith dont have a history of paying opposition players to sit out entire seasons "before" signing them to their club. We saw how pathetic it was when Milford demanded a release to join Brisbane to be with his ill father, who was living with him in Canberra at the time.
Actually it does. Brisbane have history. Penrith dont. Just because your dont get it, or dont want to get it doesnt men it isnt true.None of what you have posted above refutes my point.
Actually it does. Brisbane have history. Penrith dont. Just because your dont get it, or dont want to get it doesnt men it isnt true.
Too many substitutes are also making the game one dimensional
Actually it does. Brisbane have history. Penrith dont. Just because your dont get it, or dont want to get it doesnt men it isnt true.
RLP says 21 games at centre and 1 at fullback.Did Michael Hancock ever play anywhere other than wing? I know Willie Carne played centre and fullback, and Rod Wishart started off as a centre. Lote Tiquiri played a handful of games at fullback for the donkeys. How many players are genuine specialists in that they've never, ever played a different position though?
Once? Tallis, Ikin and tried the same with Barba and Milford. Besides, every club talks to contracted players you tard!No, it actually doesn't Misty. Just because you repeat your point in an abbreviated form, it doesn't make it any less fallacious.
Your point suggests that because Brisbane once paid a player to sit out a year as his club wouldn't release him, it's fine to criticise them for negotiating with a contracted player, while sparing that criticism of any other club or entity. Pretty much the definition of hypocrisy is what you are defending, but it seems to be beyond you.
Hilarious stuff.
The lack of specialisation in backline positions is a growing trend that is becoming alarming. Of all those positions, the three backline positions have more unique skill requirements that any others have - arguable point, I know, but wingers and fullbacks have a unique set of requirements - especially defensively.
I think this is preventing good potential centres getting access to the polish provided by the rep arena.
But look at our Australian rep backs:
ONE POSITION:
HODGES - club and rep centre
JENNINGS - club and rep centre
MIXED POSITONS
SLATER - specialist fullback who played many origins on the wing
TATE - Club centre, rep winger
INGLIS - club fullback, centre or 5/8 - rep centre or winger (and fullback once)
BOYD - club fullback, rep winger
B MORRIS - club and rep winger, sometimes club fullback
J MORRIS - Club winger and centre, rep centre
HAYNE - Club winger initially, club fullback for 5 years - when he was a rep winger and centre
I've left out the spasmodic selections like Uate, Dugan and McManus.
The point being that there has been a long trend of picking the best players, rather than the best in their positions, going back before the Matt Bowen rep years. Specialist wingers being selected in multiple seasons = Brett Morris. Its been a long time since any other specialist wingers have nailed and held onto rep positions. Apart from Uate, Dugan and McManus, David Williams, Nathan Merrit and Hasem El Masri, Do we go back to Eric Grothe Jnr to find a club winger getting a rep gig?
Heres a challenge - before Bmoz, who was the last specialist club winger to play 15 tests on the wing for Australia? It hasnt been done this century - which is now 14 years old
Ikin never sat out anything. He was injured. Sitting out a season was never on the cards for Barba, and Milford sitting out didn't happen either. So yes - ONCE. Revisionist history at it's finest there Misty.Once? Tallis, Ikin and tried the same with Barba and Milford.
Congratulations - you just proved my point without even realising. See if you can figure out how you did it.Besides, every club talks to contracted players you tard!
The Bulldogs were as happy with the Barba arrangement as Gold Coast were with Idris, but don't let that get in the way of your moronic rant.The fact that the Gold Coast were happy with the arrangement escapes you.
Oh good. Mindless speculation - I was starting to worry that you had changed your ways.Im sure if the Titans said "no", it would have gone no further. This is absolutely nothing like Brisbane's shoddy history of paying for tantrums!
Ikin never sat out anything. He was injured. Sitting out a season was never on the cards for Barba, and Milford sitting out didn't happen either. So yes - ONCE. Revisionist history at it's finest there Misty.
Barba has no such clause but has made it clear he would have no choice but to move to Brisbane should his estranged partner decide to relocate there with their two children.
While Ben Hunt will get first crack at halfback, his partner remains uncertain as the Broncos await a decision on whether the Raiders will formally release boom rookie Anthony Milford.
Should Milford be forced to sit out the season,
Every club negotiates with contracted players to try and sign them after the current contract expires.Congratulations - you just proved my point without even realising. See if you can figure out how you did it.
The only person in the NRL who could believe that was Will Hopoate who was in a 2 year media blackout. Canterbury fought long and hard against Barba leaving you genius.The Bulldogs were as happy with the Barba arrangement as Gold Coast were with Idris,
Wow you are a smart cookie to work that out Loudtard. Maybe you make the connection to the players you keep crying about. :roll:Every club negotiates with contracted players to try and sign them after the current contract expires.
I'm sure you can provide evidence of that you dumbmerkin. None of the geniused links you have provided have shown anything other than your devotion to the bullshit media stories without any quotes from the players themselves. Are you actually a beetroot face or bourbon beccy account?Brisbane's attempts involve players threats and tantrums to sit out contracts. But thanks for trying to ignore this aspect.
And with your lack of intelligence you can't get through you thick skull that the bulldogs released him...... man are as dumb as dogshit.Canterbury fought long and hard against Barba leaving you genius.
Every club negotiates with contracted players to try and sign them after the current contract expires.
The Idris deal was worked out amicably between the Panthers, the Titans, and Idris.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/...million-for-2014/story-fn2mcuj6-1226700930481Castle was tight-lipped on recent negotiations when contacted on Tuesday night.
"We've had some preliminary discussions with Brisbane, but things are long way from being finalised," she said.
Castle told of the complex negotiations and why the process was drawn-out.
"There were many complicated elements that needed to be considered around Ben’s request for a release and we're pleased to have achieved a result that leaves everyone comfortable with the outcome,” Castle said.
:lol: Aspect - is that your new term for "ridiculous opinion"?Brisbane's attempts involve players threats and tantrums to sit out contracts. But thanks for trying to ignore this aspect.
The only person in the NRL who could believe that was Will Hopoate who was in a 2 year media blackout. Canterbury fought long and hard against Barba leaving you genius.
How presumptuous of you. I would return the favour, but it's too difficult to tell if you're either:You are Gen Y.