What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I'll trade you a Payne for a Lowrie

Tiger Hawk

Bench
Messages
2,928
Why bother getting worked up over Plum? Sure he's decent but we hardly need another back-rower. Had we signed him we'd all be rolling our eyes and moaning "oh great, ANOTHER back-rower, well done supercoach". I'd rather we rolled that $75k or whatever Plum signed for into the rest of our kitty and target a prop.

We have two genuine, experience props for next year in Gibbs & Galloway. Two!! Payten plays more as a back-rower these days, Skando hasn't re-signed and we've just shipped out Laurie (who was also more a back-rower and was hardly experienced anyway). Two freaking props and you're crying over us NOT signing a fringe first-grade back-rower? Give it a rest.
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
What have we signed so far? some wingers and reserve grade back rowers.

What have we got rid of, a prop/back rower, a fullback, a winger and a centre.

Where have we always struggled. Defence. It was just an option. He was on the cheap and would be handy for depth imo. No one was suggesting we should chase him hard, not even myself. One post about it is not showing massive interest.

My missus doesn't get as worked up as you when she has the sh*ts and has her rags at the same time.

f**king relax you dopey merkin.
 

Tiger Hawk

Bench
Messages
2,928
What have we signed so far? some wingers and reserve grade back rowers.

What have we got rid of, a prop/back rower, a fullback, a winger and a centre.
And that has relevance to Plum how?
Where have we always struggled. Defence. It was just an option. He was on the cheap and would be handy for depth imo. No one was suggesting we should chase him hard, not even myself.
On one hand you make it sound like signing Plum would somehow solve our defensive issues, but then you go on with how you weren't suggesting we should chase him hard? And in terms of depth, we don't need to sign fringe first-graders - we have three teams we can rely on for that!
One post about it is not showing massive interest.
It was three posts, with the end of the last finishing with
nice going supercoach
as if to say that we've somehow missed out by not even going after a fringe first grader!
My missus doesn't get as worked up as you when she has the sh*ts and has her rags at the same time.
That's nice, but then again didn't she just come in off the last boat?
f**king relax you dopey merkin.
I am relaxed mate, you're the one getting worked up over our decision to not even approach a fringe first-grader!!
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
And that has relevance to Plum how?
I was referring to signings (ie - signing Plum)

On one hand you make it sound like signing Plum would somehow solve our defensive issues, but then you go on with how you weren't suggesting we should chase him hard? And in terms of depth, we don't need to sign fringe first-graders - we have three teams we can rely on for that!
"make it sound like" thus, you assumed. I didn't say he would solve anything. Another assumption. And I didn't suggest we chase him hard. You assumed that as well. And regarding your laughable comment 'we don't need to sign fringe first-graders'...what exactly have we bought so far for 2010? 5 fringe first graders and nothing else. lol

It was three posts, with the end of the last finishing with as if to say that we've somehow missed out by not even going after a fringe first grader!
"as if to say" another assumption. Given the clubs recruitment thus far for 2010, i'd say I'm being reasonable given all we are signing is fringe first graders.

That's nice, but then again didn't she just come in off the last boat?
so a gutless racial comment about someone not here to defend themselves. You low life piece of sh*t.

I am relaxed mate, you're the one getting worked up over our decision to not even approach a fringe first-grader!!
relaxed, you've just posted two huge rants and a personal attack on someone who has done nothing to you.
 

Tiger Hawk

Bench
Messages
2,928
I was referring to signings (ie - signing Plum)

"make it sound like" thus, you assumed. I didn't say he would solve anything. Another assumption. And I didn't suggest we chase him hard. You assumed that as well. And regarding your laughable comment 'we don't need to sign fringe first-graders'...what exactly have we bought so far for 2010? 5 fringe first graders and nothing else. lol
Why mention defence if it has nothing to do with Plum then? f**k you're thick. And where have I supported the club signing the other fringe players? That's the point dumbass, we don't need to keep perpetuating stupidity.
"as if to say" another assumption. Given the clubs recruitment thus far for 2010, i'd say I'm being reasonable given all we are signing is fringe first graders.
So please explain what you meant by the whole "well done supercoach" comment then.
so a gutless racial comment about someone not here to defend themselves. You low life piece of sh*t.
You brought your missus up in the first place, deal with it.
relaxed, you've just posted two huge rants and a personal attack on someone who has done nothing to you.
You're right, I should've just posted a personal attack on you, cause that seems to be the way you go about things when people point out how big a f**king spastic you are.
 

nomarg

Guest
Messages
722
Lima would be sweet-

Tigers should s**t themselves over any half decent front rower with size...
 

Latest posts

Top