DJShaksta
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,226
Bullshit, Clubs and the NRL punish players all the time for breaking the law.
As a Sharks fan I would hazard a guess that he already knows this better than most.
Bullshit, Clubs and the NRL punish players all the time for breaking the law.
Yes and it is f**king wrong and turns me off the game. The NRL are not the law.Bullshit, Clubs and the NRL punish players all the time for breaking the law.
Show me where Inglis threatened murder? Show me where he was convicted? Show me where his alleged victim was pregnant? This case is worse on multiple levels.Agreed. Inglis should be as well.
Bird and co. too
At many "normal" workplaces you'll get sacked for a conviction. And at most you wouldn't be hired.FFS, we have the police, the justice department for a reason.
It has been dealt with by the law, the NRL is not the f**king law.
Show me where Inglis threatened murder? Show me where he was convicted? Show me where his alleged victim was pregnant? This case is worse on multiple levels.
At many "normal" workplaces you'll get sacked for a conviction. And at most you wouldn't be hired.
People convicted of serious crimes like this have no place in our game.
And as for people thinking I'm biased. I was 100% behind my team getting rid of Junior Vaivai when he got in trouble in a similar situation. I'm just disappointed another club picked him up and the NRL being useless as usual didn't step in.
There should be 3 indiscretions that the NRL has an absolute zero tolerance for and issues immediate permanent bans. Those 3 are as follows:
1. Convictions for violence against women.
2. Any positive test for performance enhancing drugs.
3. Match fixing.
Show me where Inglis threatened murder? Show me where he was convicted? Show me where his alleged victim was pregnant? This case is worse on multiple levels.
At many "normal" workplaces you'll get sacked for a conviction. And at most you wouldn't be hired.
People convicted of serious crimes like this have no place in our game.
And as for people thinking I'm biased. I was 100% behind my team getting rid of Junior Vaivai when he got in trouble in a similar situation. I'm just disappointed another club picked him up and the NRL being useless as usual didn't step in.
There should be 3 indiscretions that the NRL has an absolute zero tolerance for and issues immediate permanent bans. Those 3 are as follows:
1. Convictions for violence against women.
2. Any positive test for performance enhancing drugs.
3. Match fixing.
lol at NRL consistency on these matters. Where's ummm when you need him?
Inglis was never found guilty of anything. His now wife has said he was protecting her when she was potentially about to self harm. Completely different situation to this one where Gordon has actually been found guilty.You are pathetic.
Just because Inglis didn't get a conviction doesn't mean he didn't do it.
In a perfect world anyone found guilty of violence against women should be banned. Including Greggy boy 'protecting' his Mrs.
Inglis was never found guilty of anything. His now wife has said he was protecting her when she was potentially about to self harm. Completely different situation to this one where Gordon has actually been found guilty.
Inglis was never found guilty of anything. His now wife has said he was protecting her when she was potentially about to self harm. Completely different situation to this one where Gordon has actually been found guilty.
After seeing the NRL accept the Shaun Metcalf registration, nothing surprises me anymore. Robert Lui's case or this one are peanuts compared to it really...