Ok, fair point that he was clearly turfed.. but I think you missed my point that the NRL had a clear opportunity to relocate a struggling club and V'Landys effectively vetoed it.
It wouldn't necessarily have been culling or merging - in fact, I can understand those two options being unpalatable, given the experience of the late 1990s-early 2000s.. BUT we've never tried relocation - something the AFL has done successfully.. and from what this says, the door was slammed on it by V'Landys.. despite other officials *at least* considering it.
We ARE NOT THE A.F.L!!
constant comparisons because we rival them in veiwerships, don't mean we need to follow their lead, we shouldn't be turfing clubs coz they are struggling, as in a few years they might be one of our biggest assets, you only need to look at souths as an example, they were perennial losers, and culled as a result to the "criteria" and now?
Most nswrl fans aren't fond of the warriors, but they are in another country, something AFL will most probably never have... so every club has something unique, and all together the brand is strong because they all play a part, whether it looks valuable or cost more than others.
Sharks are no different, nor was North Sydney or any if the teams forced to merge back before 2000, yes dragons have seem to make it work, and tigers somewhat when they both were in good form, but now there is still baggage, and throwing clubs out is not the way to treat your customer/fanbase, it breeds resentment, and that will trickle thru to other clubs especially when they fear they might be next, coz you've already done it once.
Relocation should not be a punishment, it should be offered at deaths door, or paid/incentivised to everyone, but not pushed onto any club. The NRL will hurt as a brand if any one club goes thru what souths went thru back in 1999..
Its not worth giving a leg up to rival codes, especially since northern suburbs/sydney has no presence in top flight, thats a possible 500 thousand to 1million people watching other codes, instead of ours, imagine what would happen in the shire, its a rugby league junior nursery there, its very large, but people here keep looking at population of council, not junior players actually playing the game in those areas, under their catchments, Penrith is giganitic.
but using council population as data? thats means shit, if your not playing league, to put it in perspective Melbourne has 5 million population, but no one plays league. We have a team in Melbourne to show we can have a team in Melbourne really, who are they servicing? Victoria, maybe, maybe it will grow into something better, maybe when AFL stops being a thing... you need teams where the game is played, not just for click count crowds, for participation, otherwise we'll be importing players from Nz and the PIs for the next 20 years till the game goes broke