franklin2323
Immortal
- Messages
- 33,547
Lewis was on bugger all for us so no reason too release him. Yet in both cases no where did we say these players are in our long term plans.
Every club has three or four players earning over 500k, they are your game changer type players, currently the Panthers have none, how can you hope to compete with an average player list. The irony is, he is letting go of local marquee talent like Lewis, Gordon and Jennings to sign a superstar in JT, but someone like JT will look at the clubs roster and then up his fee if he has to play with an average roster. Then they will try and use JT like Petro to sign other players, where they will again pay overs for players because they have a shite roster, in three years the Panthers will be in the same position, having huge back ended contracts, but this time paying players who have no local and cultural relationship with the club.
The mercenaries we have now are mostly a stop gap. With the new focus on juniors we should have a team largely made up of locals (with up and coming halves coached by Thurston) in a few years.
What he said!I think a lot of you are underestimating Phil Gould. I can understand why because on the surface you have lost Jennings, Gordon and Lewis and it probably feels like you have been rebuilding for years already. However, Gould came along when your club was basically falling apart.
As others have already said; Elliot and Leary really mucked things up when they were running the show. So much so that a centre was on the same kind of money as a halfback and captain. Something has to give and thankfully Gus Gould has the gumption to make the tough calls:
* Cut an overpaid and under performing Jennings
* Cut Gordon who was overpaid for a winger and never on the field
* Cut Lewis who wielded too much power over the playing group
The worst thing to happen to Penrith was the culture present under Matt Elliot where Petro "players union" Civoniceva was handed the reigns by the coach. Luke Lewis picked up where Petro left off and there were too many chiefs and not enough Indians. When Elliot was cut, the players marched into Mick Leary's office demanding answers; the audacity of it all. You are being payed by the club and you play for whoever the club tells you to play for. The only reason why they did not want Elliot to leave was because they could do whatever they damn well pleased. A formula of that kind will never be successful.
Tough decisions have been made, but Gus has bought in the most promising young coach in the game who takes no f**king prisoners. Gould is an absolute master at identifying young talent and he is a very influential human being. Give it time for the master plan to be executed and I think the Panther will rise again!
Lewis was on bugger all for us so no reason too release him. Yet in both cases no where did we say these players are in our long term plans.
Which players have we said are in our long term plans?
In fact Gus has even said so. "they are journeyman hired to do a job and make us competitive while we build a team to be a premiership threat in 2015". I am happy to buy into that because you can't turn around a team in one year when it was as bad as we were.
Which players have we said are in our long term plans?
In fact Gus has even said so. "they are journeyman hired to do a job and make us competitive while we build a team to be a premiership threat in 2015". I am happy to buy into that because you can't turn around a team in one year when it was as bad as we were.
Hmm, Lang inherited a dally m winning half back, a SOO front rower, an Australian rep hooker and the most underrated centre (SOO quality) in the last ten years. He then got a second dally m winning half back. It also coincided with a local junior full back becoming one of the top three players in his position at the time (Rhys W). The spine of 1, 6,7 and 9 was all of the highest quality. The current team spine does not have a single player who would be selected in that team. Sure, we had a good centre, Jenko, a rep quality back rower - Luke and a reasonable full back/winger. All non-core positions. Luke Lewis and Michael Gordon spend more time in casualty than on the pitch. Sorry, but to compare what John Lang inherited from Royce to the current bunch is laughable. Besides the players that were in both squads (Lewis, Waterhouse) I doubt a single player in the 2011 team, except maybe Jenko would have made the 2001 team. The form of Ross, Clinton and Lang in 2001 onwards would have kept Tim Grant on the bench at best.Yes maybe a season is too short. But Gus joined in mid 2011 and he's saying it will be 4 seasons to challenge.
Richo and Lang joined at the end of wooden spoon year 2001 and we'd won a comp in 2003.
Lang and Richo spent zero time looking back at Simmons and Levy, the accepted what they had to deal with and they got on with taking responsibility and doing what they had to do and managing the team and the club.
Gus has spent enormous energy blaming the past, the players, some fan groups, anyone he can find. Think about this and the reason he has given himself 4 years before he starts being accountable.
:lol::lol:Some people have selective memories. We were a basketcase in 01-02 like we are now.
Shall we look at the premiership winning team:
Presto- reserve grade at Sharks.
Wesser couldn't catch a ball in 2001.
Clinton debut 2002.
Waterhouse debut 2002.
Ben Ross debut 2002.
Whatuira debut 2002.
Galuvao an overweight fullback can't crack Warriors team.
Swain far too small.
Rodney's 1st year.
Lewis, Rooney 20 yos with 20 or so 1st grade games.
We had decent 1st graders like Elford, Hicks, Turner, Pritchard all play in the reserve grade game GF day.
I remember that. It must have pissed off the Canberra players no end. Fast forward to them sticking 70 points past us.....Its not often I would disagree with you Franklin, but I would have to agree with Pomoz. Lang had work to do no doubt but the foundations were there.
I think Richo started the rot with some stupid backended contracts hence Elliott claiming to have inherited a mess. Problem is he & Leary dumped some "stars" and then did the same bloody thing that had caused the issue to start with. Only arguably with stupider contracts.
Gus & Cleary are in the same boat Elliott claimed to be, but at least although we cop a painful cleanout we should also have the foundations not to need a repeat every few years. I dont buy into everything Gus says but I think he is on the right track regarding recruitment & retention.
Gus & Ivan also stated from day one there would be some pain. Elliott started by saying now he finally has some decent "Cattle"
Fair enough. I don't have rose coloured glasses though. Being a season ticket holder I sat through all the floggings gritting my teeth. In fact, I think we won 7 games in Langy's first year (02), the same as Royce in his last year. But 2003 and 2004 were good years and the team was playing some of the best attacking football anywhere in the NRL. It went downhill after that culminating in the appointment of Elliott in 2007 and mediocrity reigned thereafter.My bad Pomoz, stupid mistake about Gower by me. No idea what I was thinking there.
I do think Gus and Ivan are setting a good recruitment base.
What I find intolerable is Gus' need to continually harp and blame others. And to continually give himself 4 years breathing space.
And I still think you are looking at 2001 and 2002 with brightly coloured hindsight glasses. The premiership in 2003 covered up the mess that was 2001 and the struggle that was 2002.
Farnklin, I don't see what relevance there is in comparing the 2003 team with what he inherited. To compare apples with apples we will have to see what Gus has built in a few years.
Without doubt, Gus is not as unassuming and down to earth as Langy and comes across as an egotistical type. But lets not confuse the issue of the mess Gus has inherited, with Gus's unpleasant persona.