What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Join the Parramatta Football Club!!!!

Gazzamatta

Coach
Messages
15,591
Rebel Eels ticket – Make Parra Matter Again – has failed in bid to take control of Leagues Club board
An attempt by a rebel group to seize control of the Parramatta Leagues club, has been a sensational and expensive failure, despite backing from some of the Eels’ heavyweight former players.

A rebel bid to take control of the Parramatta Leagues Club has ended in high farce after the meeting was abandoned because there were insufficient members in attendance to conduct a valid vote.
The group behind the rebel ticket — called Make Parra Matter Again and backed by some of the club’s heavyweight former players — failed to rally enough support to achieve their aim of deposing four of the existing seven directors.
The expensive exercise is believed to have cost the Leagues Club — which financially supports the football club — in the vicinity of $400,000.
While it came at a high cost to the Leagues Club, the collapse of the rebel bid was a show of support for the current administration and new coach Jason Ryles, who has been charged with reviving the fortunes of the embattled club.

The last thing the Eels — and Ryles — needed was a return to the historical in-fighting that shadowed the club for years and hampered their ability to challenge for a premiership.
For too long, Parramatta got in their own way. The fear was that a rebel win would see a return to the past.
The rebel ticket had hoped to prey on the disappointing 2024 season to garner enough support to make change at the leagues club but ultimately their bid, which was fronted by former pizza shop owner Michael Barillaro, came to nothing.
Former Eels boss Roy Spagnolo was reportedly working in the background to help the bid. However, their efforts fell embarrassingly short, albeit at huge expense to the leagues club.
Sources confirmed the cost of the EGM was at least $400,000, but rise as high as $500,000.
Chair Sean McElduff had warned that a successful vote would mark a return to the days of factionalism that led to the club being a laughing stock within the game.

McElduff needn’t have worried. For all their bluster, the rebel ticket never amounted to a genuine threat to the current regime.
The online votes recorded before the meeting was cancelled reinforced that the rebel ticket were fighting a losing battle.
All four directors who were challenged – Sue Coleman, Richard Foda, Mark Jenkins and Joy Cusask – won at least 60 per cent of the online vote.
It didn’t matter in the end because the rebel ticket couldn’t even convince the required 100 voting members to attend the meeting.
As a result, the meeting was dissolved and none of the resolutions were passed.
“By 7.15pm there were insufficient voting members present and as such the
All existing directors will continue to serve the club and it’s members.”

EGM was dissolved by operation of the constitution, and no resolutions were passed,” the club said in a statement.
“All existing directors will continue to serve the club and it’s members.”
You're a legend Johnny posting all these paywalled stories. Very much appreciated buddy.
👍👍👍👍👍
 
Messages
15,337
It's just sad, It really is,

There were people who were against the changes who waited outside the room for the meeting to not start. They were out numbered and couldn't even meet the constiutional requirements.

At one stage the screen showed the other two venues, with a total of 10 people in Vikings and Dural combined, it was just so sad.

I get that they year sucked but please the amount of press you got about this you could at least get 50 of your own people to a meeting on a Tuesday night when nothing else was happening.
 
Last edited:

T.S Quint

Coach
Messages
14,389
So one of the reasons for this EGM was to try and "put people with Rugby League IQ" on the board.

We were never told who these people with Rugby League IQ are. Who did they want to put on there?
Maybe if they had people come out and say they would nominate themselves for the board, explain their experience and what they can bring to the club, etc, then maybe they would have had more success.

As it was, it was just a bunch of idiots angry at the club for finishing 3rd last and losing a few juniors, wanting to try and 'fix things' by sacking everyone with no idea of what to do next. Then Spags steps in and convinces them that this is the right thing to do so he can worm his way back again.

If people with 'Rugby League IQ' want to be a part of the board then fine, nominate yourself at the next elections which are held each year and go through the process. But we won't get people with Rugby League IQ, we will get stupid former players like Ray Price and Eric Grothe Jr who couldn't run a club if they tried. We can only elect people who nominate themselves, and choose the best from that lot.
 
Messages
15,337
With the vote counts the way they were they would have needed between 470 and 488 people to vote with them on the day.

They lost the vote, they couldn't even organise a Quorum, what makes them think they could run a club worth Hundreds of Millions of dollars
 

JokerEel

Coach
Messages
13,211
With the vote counts the way they were they would have needed between 470 and 488 people to vote with them on the day.

They lost the vote, they couldn't even organise a Quorum, what makes them think they could run a club worth Hundreds of Millions of dollars


Yep that's what these idiots also don't get even if 100 people turned up last night the online vote didn't go their way..

Some of the shit I have been reading makes me glad the club went to shit in 2016 and now stupid people are never running the club/s again.
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
29,577
I think (and Pou would agree with me) that it shows this ticket was based playing to the emotions of a lot of people who are just annoyed at onfield performance and broadbrushing it to everyone who could be perceived to be the problem.

But when people aren’t forced to vote it takes a lot more to get people who are emotional over the vote to get them to vote than it takes people who are intelligent of the vote to go vote.
 

King-Gutho94

Coach
Messages
15,108
I think (and Pou would agree with me) that it shows this ticket was based playing to the emotions of a lot of people who are just annoyed at onfield performance and broadbrushing it to everyone who could be perceived to be the problem.

But when people aren’t forced to vote it takes a lot more to get people who are emotional over the vote to get them to vote than it takes people who are intelligent of the vote to go vote.
Pou basically agrees with everything that has been said in this thread why do you think he has barely posted in here.
 
Top