What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Join the Parramatta Football Club!!!!

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,941
SR1 seems innocuous and ok, if it is just to align the constitution with changes to the Clubs Act. However it is a lengthy resolution, and depending on where the resolution came from (which members proposed it), I'd be double checking there isn't some hidden detail that opens the gate for a Roy or similar to do something unintended....
MInns wants it gone. It's stupid that I live 4.5km as the crow flies from the club and they won't let me in.

“Red tape that gets in the way of people in NSW enjoying themselves for no discernible benefit will continue to go into the shredder under the Minns Labor Government.

“It has been an unwanted rite of passage for so many to be stuck in bureaucratic limbo over membership at the entry to a Club when all you want to do is go inside for a drink and a meal.

“Scrapping the 5km rule is just the start of our next round of reforms to reboot the nightlife and vibrancy of the state which are all about boosting the night-time economy, treating adults like adults and stripping back redundant red tape.”


 

emjaycee

Coach
Messages
13,907
So on first glance...

SR1 seems innocuous and ok, if it is just to align the constitution with changes to the Clubs Act. However it is a lengthy resolution, and depending on where the resolution came from (which members proposed it), I'd be double checking there isn't some hidden detail that opens the gate for a Roy or similar to do something unintended....

SR2 sounds good as it appears to be a clause that would root out proven failed people from being members (and potentially Directors). I'd fully support this, so that the stains from our club's past can't come back into power.

SR3 sounds good, provided it is to increase the current number/% required to call an SGM to 5% (and not to drop it down to 5%)?

SR4 sounds good, and provides clarity and accountability about anyone is getting our details while trying to direct market to get themselves elected to Director positions.
SR3 - as described, currently the consitution allows for 5% or 200 members, whichever is the lesser to call an EGM. The resolution removes the 200 number and requires 5% only. 5% of 42,000 eligible members is 2,100 members so it is definitely not a decrease.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,941
Explanatory Notes – Special Resolution 1

1 The Club adopted a new Constitution in 2019, which included clause 9.6 (Retirement or Rotation of
Directors). This clause 9.6 introduced the concept of a 'First Board', comprising the Directors holding
office on and from the 2020 AGM, and prescribed how these Directors would retire or rotate in the AGMs
held in 2021 to 2023. This was introduced to enable elections of the Board to occur in accordance with
the 'triennial rule' under Schedule 4 of the Registered Clubs Act.

2 As of the 2023 AGM, the first Retirement Cycle was completed with all Directors appointed to the 'First
Board
' now retired (and some being re-elected to the position of Director).

3 The 'First Board' concept is therefore no longer required in the Constitution. To streamline the
Constitution, Special Resolution 1 proposes to delete references to the 'First Board' in the Constitution,
as set out in the wording of the resolution above.

4 There are a number of incorrectly formatted definitions contained within clause 1.1 of the Constitution.
If Special Resolution 1 is passed, it will correct the formatting of the definitions contained within clause
1.1 of the Constitution, making it easier to locate and read definitions within clause 1.1.

5 Existing clause 3.4(a) provides that a person may only be admitted as a Temporary member of the Club
if the person's permanent place of residence in New South Wales is at least 5 kilometres from the Club's
premises or such greater distance as may be determined by the Board.

6 The NSW Government recently passed the Vibrancy Reforms, which abolished the deemed rule
contained in section 30(3B) of the Registered Clubs Act (which applies to all registered clubs) that
persons are only eligible to attend as temporary members of a registered club if they reside a minimum
of 5 kilometres from the premises of the registered club they are attending.

7 If Special Resolution 1 is passed, existing clause 3.4(a) will be deleted. This will remove the requirement
for a person that lives within 5 kilometres of the Club's premises from having to become a member of
the Club prior to being able to access the Club's premises.
The amendment is consistent with the
changes to the Registered Clubs Act as part of the NSW Government's Vibrancy Reforms.

8 Special Resolution 1 also proposes to make changes to ensure the Constitution contemplates certain
procedures for admitting and recognising members, undertaken for the purposes of amalgamation.


9 For the avoidance of doubt, this Special Resolution 1 does not relate to and is not the result of a
particular amalgamation opportunity. Instead, this Special Resolution 1 is proposed to reduce the need
for special resolutions in any potential future amalgamations and to streamline future versions of the
Constitution.


10 Section 17AC(2) of the Registered Clubs Act requires that before registered clubs amalgamate, the
parent club must under its rules (i.e. the Constitution) establish the members of the dissolved club as a
separate class of members for the purposes of identification. Accordingly, all persons joining the Club
that were formerly members of the Amalgamating Club will be identified as former members of the
Amalgamating Club in the Club's membership register.

11 If passed, Special Resolution 1 will amend existing clauses 4.3 and 4.4 of the Constitution.

12 Paragraph (a) of proposed new clause 4.3 replicates the wording of existing clause 4.3.

13 The proposed new paragraphs (b) to (d) of new clause 4.3 set out a more streamlined process to admit
persons as members pursuant to an amalgamation, where they won't need to submit new applications
with all of their details again.

14 Paragraphs (a) and (b) of proposed new clause 4.4 replicate the wording of existing clause 4.4.

15 The proposed new paragraph (c) of new clause 4.4 satisfies the requirements of section 17AC(2) of the
Registered Clubs Act.

16 In the event of a future amalgamation, all members of the dissolving club or child club must first agree
to become members before they can be admitted to membership of the Club.

17 Special Resolution 1 will also make a change to clause 9.10 in respect of Directors' remuneration to
make the wording more consistent with the Registered Clubs Act.
 
Messages
11,983
Explanatory Notes – Special Resolution 1

1 The Club adopted a new Constitution in 2019, which included clause 9.6 (Retirement or Rotation of
Directors). This clause 9.6 introduced the concept of a 'First Board', comprising the Directors holding
office on and from the 2020 AGM, and prescribed how these Directors would retire or rotate in the AGMs
held in 2021 to 2023. This was introduced to enable elections of the Board to occur in accordance with
the 'triennial rule' under Schedule 4 of the Registered Clubs Act.

2 As of the 2023 AGM, the first Retirement Cycle was completed with all Directors appointed to the 'First
Board
' now retired (and some being re-elected to the position of Director).

3 The 'First Board' concept is therefore no longer required in the Constitution. To streamline the
Constitution, Special Resolution 1 proposes to delete references to the 'First Board' in the Constitution,
as set out in the wording of the resolution above.

4 There are a number of incorrectly formatted definitions contained within clause 1.1 of the Constitution.
If Special Resolution 1 is passed, it will correct the formatting of the definitions contained within clause
1.1 of the Constitution, making it easier to locate and read definitions within clause 1.1.

5 Existing clause 3.4(a) provides that a person may only be admitted as a Temporary member of the Club
if the person's permanent place of residence in New South Wales is at least 5 kilometres from the Club's
premises or such greater distance as may be determined by the Board.

6 The NSW Government recently passed the Vibrancy Reforms, which abolished the deemed rule
contained in section 30(3B) of the Registered Clubs Act (which applies to all registered clubs) that
persons are only eligible to attend as temporary members of a registered club if they reside a minimum
of 5 kilometres from the premises of the registered club they are attending.

7 If Special Resolution 1 is passed, existing clause 3.4(a) will be deleted. This will remove the requirement
for a person that lives within 5 kilometres of the Club's premises from having to become a member of
the Club prior to being able to access the Club's premises.
The amendment is consistent with the
changes to the Registered Clubs Act as part of the NSW Government's Vibrancy Reforms.

8 Special Resolution 1 also proposes to make changes to ensure the Constitution contemplates certain
procedures for admitting and recognising members, undertaken for the purposes of amalgamation.


9 For the avoidance of doubt, this Special Resolution 1 does not relate to and is not the result of a
particular amalgamation opportunity. Instead, this Special Resolution 1 is proposed to reduce the need
for special resolutions in any potential future amalgamations and to streamline future versions of the
Constitution.


10 Section 17AC(2) of the Registered Clubs Act requires that before registered clubs amalgamate, the
parent club must under its rules (i.e. the Constitution) establish the members of the dissolved club as a
separate class of members for the purposes of identification. Accordingly, all persons joining the Club
that were formerly members of the Amalgamating Club will be identified as former members of the
Amalgamating Club in the Club's membership register.

11 If passed, Special Resolution 1 will amend existing clauses 4.3 and 4.4 of the Constitution.

12 Paragraph (a) of proposed new clause 4.3 replicates the wording of existing clause 4.3.

13 The proposed new paragraphs (b) to (d) of new clause 4.3 set out a more streamlined process to admit
persons as members pursuant to an amalgamation, where they won't need to submit new applications
with all of their details again.

14 Paragraphs (a) and (b) of proposed new clause 4.4 replicate the wording of existing clause 4.4.

15 The proposed new paragraph (c) of new clause 4.4 satisfies the requirements of section 17AC(2) of the
Registered Clubs Act.

16 In the event of a future amalgamation, all members of the dissolving club or child club must first agree
to become members before they can be admitted to membership of the Club.

17 Special Resolution 1 will also make a change to clause 9.10 in respect of Directors' remuneration to
make the wording more consistent with the Registered Clubs Act.
Thanks for digging that out... the bits I was potentially concerned about were from 8 - 14 above. They didn't make a lot of sense in reading the proposed text of the changes re membership etc, but if the context is just to reduce need to "dick around" when the club takes over other smaller clubs in the future to ensure their members are amalgamated easily, then sounds good also.
 

T.S Quint

Coach
Messages
14,726
I’m in Griffith at the moment.
Walking along the Main Street today and a taxi pulls up on the road ahead.
It has an advertisement for “Roy Spagnolo & Associates Accounting” on the side door.

No surprises that Mr Dodgy f**ker is advertising in Mafia Central.
 

Latest posts

Top