I do agree Wade Graham is a very good player who deserves to play rep footy.
People here are judging Jackson on his last game, in a side that didn't have a good day.
He is a good defender who makes lots of tackles, can run a good line, has a bit of footy work a footy brain and can pass the ball.
In other words he is a traditional NRL 2nd Rower, he is very good at club level, but has not shown much in rep footy at this stage.
His attack at club level looks bad at present that is more to do with the fact that the whole Dogs attack is misfiring, in particular the service he gets from the halves is poor and the Dogs pack doesn't always establish go forward in the middle of the park.
So if he gets slow service, in a flat attacking line, with a well set defense right on top of him there is not much he can do.
Alternatively if he gets good ball with a bit of room to move he can break the line or set up his center.
Again it depends what you want in rep footy, I do agree Wade Graham is probably a better option.