What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

JR's Wins until 33.3333%

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
94,300
*
LlwvCUYZQHbRAzR-1600x900-noPad.jpg
 
Messages
19,724
Winning either (or both) of our next 2 games will allow JR to reach the magic 33.333333333333333333% win/loss record. The Sharks game might be a big ask, but the Dolphins might be achievable.
 
Messages
13,268
It will take about five years before Ryles’ sample is big enough to judge his performance. Look at Sticky, he made three grand finals before the Roosters realised he was a dud.
What was your judgment of Arthur's performance after the first five years in the head coach role... i.e. 2014-2018. When his win percentage sample at that point was 25%....
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
94,300
What was your judgment of Arthur's performance after the first five years in the head coach role... i.e. 2014-2018. When his win percentage sample at that point was 25%....
You'd have to go back and check, though I'm sure you already have, and if you had found a gotcha you would have used it. Soz
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
94,300
Also last year BA was sacked with a 3-7 season

Currently we are at 3-7.

That means Ryles=BA
Exactly my point. Ryles has a poor record with players unavailable, just like Arthur's. However Ryles has had players unavailable for his entire (short) NRL career thus far. Over a larger sample this sort of bad luck evens out.
 
Messages
13,268
You'd have to go back and check,
No, that's up to you just to answer a simple question put to you after you posted about needing five years to judge Sticky or Ryles.
though I'm sure you already have,
False... I think you overrate the care factor.
and if you had found a gotcha you would have used it. Soz
No - but I'm sure there are plenty of gotchas about this topic of BA's performance and whether and/or when he should have been sacked in your convoluted circular posting history....

It was a simple question to you, which only a troll would avoid - when BA's win percentage with your ideal sample size of five years was 25%, what would you conclude about his coaching performance?
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
94,300
No, that's up to you just to answer a simple question put to you after you posted about needing five years to judge Sticky or Ryles.

False... I think you overrate the care factor.

No - but I'm sure there are plenty of gotchas about this topic of BA's performance and whether and/or when he should have been sacked in your convoluted circular posting history....

It was a simple question to you, which only a troll would avoid - when BA's win percentage with your ideal sample size of five years was 25%, what would you conclude about his coaching performance?
I didn't answer it because you've fabricated a fact. His win rate was much higher than 25% after five years. Why would you make something like that up unless you were trying to set me up?
 
Top