Cumberland Eel
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,192
What was your judgment of Arthur's performance after the first five years in the head coach role... i.e. 2014-2018. When his win percentage sample at that point was 25%....It will take about five years before Ryles’ sample is big enough to judge his performance. Look at Sticky, he made three grand finals before the Roosters realised he was a dud.
Plus Ryles has hair, wears shoes and doesn't steal bags.Also last year BA was sacked with a 3-7 season
Currently we are at 3-7.
That means Ryles=BA
You'd have to go back and check, though I'm sure you already have, and if you had found a gotcha you would have used it. SozWhat was your judgment of Arthur's performance after the first five years in the head coach role... i.e. 2014-2018. When his win percentage sample at that point was 25%....
Our for against after 10 rounds last year was -103Also last year BA was sacked with a 3-7 season
Currently we are at 3-7.
That means Ryles=BA
Exactly my point. Ryles has a poor record with players unavailable, just like Arthur's. However Ryles has had players unavailable for his entire (short) NRL career thus far. Over a larger sample this sort of bad luck evens out.Also last year BA was sacked with a 3-7 season
Currently we are at 3-7.
That means Ryles=BA
No, that's up to you just to answer a simple question put to you after you posted about needing five years to judge Sticky or Ryles.You'd have to go back and check,
False... I think you overrate the care factor.though I'm sure you already have,
No - but I'm sure there are plenty of gotchas about this topic of BA's performance and whether and/or when he should have been sacked in your convoluted circular posting history....and if you had found a gotcha you would have used it. Soz
I didn't answer it because you've fabricated a fact. His win rate was much higher than 25% after five years. Why would you make something like that up unless you were trying to set me up?No, that's up to you just to answer a simple question put to you after you posted about needing five years to judge Sticky or Ryles.
False... I think you overrate the care factor.
No - but I'm sure there are plenty of gotchas about this topic of BA's performance and whether and/or when he should have been sacked in your convoluted circular posting history....
It was a simple question to you, which only a troll would avoid - when BA's win percentage with your ideal sample size of five years was 25%, what would you conclude about his coaching performance?