What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Judiciary Survey

video_ref

Juniors
Messages
50
Well, I've got one more legal studies assignment to go and then I'm finished for Yr 12.
icon_cheers.gif
It can be on any aspect of law so I decided to do it on the NRL Judiciary. I think I'll argue that the Judiciary is poorly structured or biased or something. Anyway, I'd appreciate it if you'd do this survey on the effectiveness of the Judiciary. I need to get at least 20 people to do it. Its mainly yes/no questions and should only take 1 or 2 mins.

Here's the link: http://www.samszone.gwgaming.net/survey/public/survey.php?name=judiciary

I'd really appreciate it if i could get some peeps to do it. Thanks.

Sam,
 

video_ref

Juniors
Messages
50
Well I've closed the survey and here are the results for anyone interested. Thanks to everyone that completed the survey..i got way more responses than I thought I would. Now I've just got to go type up the assignment for it. :roll:


1. Age:
-18 14.8% (9)
19-32 60.7% (37)
33-45 16.4% (10)
46-59 6.6% (4)
60+ 1.6% (1)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

2. Gender:
M 86.9% (53)
F 13.1% (8)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

3. Are you 100% satisfied that the NRL Judiciary always delivers fair and accurate decisions?
Yes 3.3% (2)
No 96.7% (59)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

4. Is there any inconsistency in the Judiciary’s decisions?
Yes 88.5% (54)
No 11.5% (7)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

5. Do you feel that the NRL Judiciary sometimes delivers biased decisions towards certain players or clubs?
Yes 85.2% (52)
No 14.8% (9)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

6. Should players facing the Judiciary be entitled to legal representation? Yes 73.8% (45)
No 26.2% (16)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

7. Should the NRL Judiciary be expected to adhere to the same regulations and procedures of the real legal system?
Yes 42.6% (26)
No 57.4% (35)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

8. The NRL Judiciary panel consists of three former players. Do you feel that because of their careers in the game, these former players may display favouritism towards the clubs for which they played?
Yes 42.6% (26)
No 57.4% (35)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

9. Who do you feel should sit on the NRL Judiciary Panel?
Former Players 19.7% (12)
Legal Experts 6.6% (4)
Referees/Experts of the game 42.6% (26)
Other: 31.1% (19) *Most 'other' responses were various combinitions of the 3 above options*
TOTAL 100.0% 61

10. Should each charge attract a specific penalty, or should the circumstances of each particular case determine the penalty?
Specific penalty for offence 18.0% (11)
Circumstances of case 82.0% (50)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

11. Does the fact that the NRL is also a commercial enterprise hinder its ability to deliver justice?
Yes 60.7% (37)
No 39.3% (24)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

12. Do professional sports bodies such as the NRL have too much legal power over athletes?
Yes 36.1% (22)
No 63.9% (39)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

13. Do you feel that the NRL Judiciary's decisions have been influenced by media or public pressure?
Yes 85.2% (52)
No 14.8% (9)
TOTAL 100.0% 61

14. Recently, the Judiciary suspended Canberra captain Simon Woolford for eight weeks. He lodged an application with the Judiciary to seek ‘leave to appeal’, but this was rejected by the NRL Judiciary chairman. Do you think that it is fair that that a player can be denied the right to an appeals hearing?
Yes 39.3% (24)
No 60.7% (37)
TOTAL 100.0% 61
 
Top