What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Kangaroos Certainties in Round 10?

CyberKev

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
2,323
Kangaroos, certainties next week?

Yeah, you'd have to think so! :badgrin:
 

Arnott

Juniors
Messages
20
lockyno1 said:
Mate in the first 3 games there was a bloke named Tadgh Kennelly who was missing. He is Sydney's key "link man from defence to the midfield. Now Tadgh is back, the forwards in Sydney are getting more quality ball. Sydney's forward line is potentially the best in the league on song. They have quite a few noted goalkickers in that foward line!

HAHAHAHAHAHA.

Oh please stop...you're killing me....

Sydney's forward line is hardly the best in the league.

1. Michael O'Loughlin is on a rapid decline and is now becoming a liability in the forward line for the Swans. The man can't take a mark without falling flat on his face which results in the Swans not being able to move the ball quickly to a man who is free inside 50.

2. Forward lines that are better than the Swans include Collingwood, St Kilda, Melbourne and Brisbane.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
Arnott said:
2. Forward lines that are better than the Swans include Collingwood, St Kilda, Melbourne and Brisbane.

Collingwood is just as good, granted. The other 3 mentioned are just silly. Brisbane rely on Brown, Saints rely on Gehrig and Reivolt (i would pick them at no3), and melbourne- well please Neitz is good but Robbo is inconsistent. Sydney are top 2.
 

meltiger

First Grade
Messages
6,268
lockyno1 said:
Collingwood is just as good, granted. The other 3 mentioned are just silly. Brisbane rely on Brown, Saints rely on Gehrig and Reivolt (i would pick them at no3), and melbourne- well please Neitz is good but Robbo is inconsistent. Sydney are top 2.

Oh please.


Hamill, Kosi, Rielwoldt, Gherig, Milne .... So much harder to match up on than the overated Swans.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
meltiger said:
Oh please.


Hamill, Kosi, Rielwoldt, Gherig, Milne .... So much harder to match up on than the overated Swans.

Hamil and Kosi barely play 10 games a year combined. Milne is good but he produces his best 2-3 games a year. Reivolt and Gehrig granted.

Hall- enough said
Davis- matchwinner
Buchanon- similar to milne but developing into a better player
O'Keefe- Very handy left half forward. Usually kicks straight
O'Loghlin- has lost a bit in pace but is a good target.

That is one heck of a forward line. Saints are good but not as good as sydney's.
 

meltiger

First Grade
Messages
6,268
chileman said:
Call us what you want, we aint giving back the premiership :D


Why would you?


You pay your players more than everyone else and the rules (tribunal) were changed mid-gf week to ensure your victory.


It would have been a disgraceful indictment on the club had they failed to win given the AFL essentially handed them the trophy.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
meltiger said:
the rules (tribunal) were changed mid-gf week to ensure your victory.

Hang on a sec tiger. The rules were in place since the start of the year! They were not changed for the GF!
 

meltiger

First Grade
Messages
6,268
lockyno1 said:
Hang on a sec tiger. The rules were in place since the start of the year! They were not changed for the GF!


Given the case of Fraser Gherig and his 1 match suspension I would beg to differ.


The moment Hall was cited the very futures of the tribunal members were under threat. Do not kid yourself, if he had of been rubbed out, as he should have, the individuals who cited him would have been instantly out of a job.


Sydney's premiership is tainted on so many levels it's not funny.
 

Latest posts

Top