pmarrow said:We all can't live in paradise eh ? :evil:
I think the club did the right thing in a way, take the cup runs out of us over the last two seasons and our league form has been very disappointing. We also played some very boring Rugby under John Kear and more often then not lost the games we shouldn't be losing.
When I first saw Hull this season I was genuinely excited for the club due to the amount of key Englishmen there. Was that a specific part of Kear's plans or just luck?
Sporting Life.com says something like 'the board were worried Kear didn't have enough control over his players'. What do you make of that? They didn't respect him or he was a bit like Kevin Keegan, giving them too much matey freedom?
Honestly I couldn't believe it when Hull started losing, and so badly, after the start they had, and with the quality they had in the squad.