B-Tron 3000
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,803
I'd add to that (or, rather, expand on point 3), and perhaps this is why Mark thinks we are mentally weak - I think we lack the experience to know how to win down the stretch. Sure we've got experienced players, but how many experienced (or natural) playmakers do we have?Actually it was three things:
1. Edge defence - we couldn't stop teams when they went wide against us
2. Kicking game - we failed to make the opposition work for their field position
3. General attack - in games where we dominated possession we should have been up by 4 or 5 tries, not 1 or 2.
In the Storm game, for instance, when they needed to score, they had Cameron Smith totally dominating their attack. Every ruck he was out probing at the defensive line, by either running it himself or passing to the most approriate person. EVERY play - bar none - put a strain on the defensive line. You could sense we were going to crack, but not because we were mentally weak, because their chief playmaker was consistently moving the ball to positions where our defenders had to make decisions, and eventually one of them made the wrong one.
Smith can do this because he is smart, experienced and - very importantly - is comfortable in the system that Melbourne have.
Compare that to what we did when we needed to score. We took 3 or 4 tackles where not much pressure was put on the defence, and then we flung it two off the ruck to Jarryd in hope that he did soemthing with it. Of course he couldn't because he didn't have decent halves or even a really enterprising dummy-half, and so didn't have the luxury of the defence having been shifted and moved around every play (or even being wary of someone else) - the opposition were all breathing down his neck. In addition, Jarryd was trying to be a 6 - a spot where he is inexperienced - in a new(ish) system for him. He doesn't have the luxury of years of being used to the system and his role.
Why do you think so many of his passes at the end of the close games went to ground? Because he is a bad player? Obviously not. Because he is mentally weak? You've seen him in Origin, right, when he steps up? The answer is because he was being asked to perform a role that he is simply not that experienced at, in a system he is not used to, at a time of the game when everyone in the defensive line is fully concentrating and focussed.
If we were mentally weak we wouldn't have fought back from the Penrith debacle by hitting the post with a FG in extra time - we would have packed it in on fulltime. If we were mentally weak we wouldn't have kept putting ourselves in positions to win games for so long without a win. Sure, by the time the Roosters game came around there was a concern about winning close ones, and we gave them that game somewhat through our nerves, but that would happen to anyone who had been through what we had - it is of itself not proof that there is some sort of inherent mental weakness in the club.
Last edited: