Gazzamatta
Coach
- Messages
- 15,603
Well I guess that proves it. Only 3 ppl rated Joey.No Lussick again and not injured?
Well I guess that proves it. Only 3 ppl rated Joey.No Lussick again and not injured?
BA, Clint and Joey?Well I guess that proves it. Only 3 ppl rated Joey.
BA, Gutho and Pou.Well I guess that proves it. Only 3 ppl rated Joey.
They literally determine how much luck you need.Don't forget the extremely vague impact of #resources...
I don’t rate Lussick. I just don’t rate Brendan Hands either. But I trust Arthur’s opinion over Barrett’s.BA, Gutho and Pou.
So all the sticking up for Lussick (and Hodgson before him) when others could see his flaws were just you sticking up for the week-to-week choices of the coach that you liked...I don’t rate Lussick.
But the team has played objectively (even selective statistically) better with Barrett's choice of Hands in for Lussick, you'd have to agree?But I trust Arthur’s opinion over Barrett’s.
Hodgson was class. He wasn't to blame for our problems, as proven by our form this year.So all the sticking up for Lussick (and Hodgson before him)
He’s entitled to pick the backup he prefers, whether it’s Lussick or Hands.when others could see his flaws were just you sticking up for the week-to-week choices of the coach that you liked...
No I don’t think so. The team has played better with Moses back, not because Hands is in the team.But the team has played objectively (even selective statistically) better with Barrett's choice of Hands in for Lussick, you'd have to agree?
If you rate the decisions of Barrett and Cayless that’s your business.Even previous and current Cup Coach Cayless seems to have formed an opinion on Lussick when he came in (and seems to have been dumped down from) the Cup squad - where do you rank that opinion, and this week's Cup team list selections?
The comparison should be the parts of last year without him, versus the parts of last year with him.Hodgson was class. He wasn't to blame for our problems, as proven by our form this year.
He's entitled to make mistakes too, and for people to comment on those perceived mistakes at the time of their making.He’s entitled to pick the backup he prefers, whether it’s Lussick or Hands.
But you can't use the Moses return to completely negate any comparison between Lussick and Hands. You don't have a control group/statisitical evidence supporting your outright denial of the hypothesis that the team performs better with Hands than with Lussick.No I don’t think so. The team has played better with Moses back, not because Hands is in the team.
Isn't Cayless entitled to select the hooker he wants from those available? And and the incumbent coach, shouldn't we also trust his apparent decision to overlook/banish Lussick out of Cup?If you rate the decisions of Barrett and Cayless that’s your business.
Half a season is a meaningless sample.The comparison should be the parts of last year without him, versus the parts of last year with him.
Lussick is a much better hooker than either of the ones named in reserve grade this week. He hasn’t been overlooked or banished. More likely is he’s trying to get back to England.He's entitled to make mistakes too, and for people to comment on those perceived mistakes at the time of their making.
But you can't use the Moses return to completely negate any comparison between Lussick and Hands. You don't have a control group/statisitical evidence supporting your outright denial of the hypothesis that the team performs better with Hands than with Lussick.
Isn't Cayless entitled to select the hooker he wants from those available? And and the incumbent coach, shouldn't we also trust his apparent decision to overlook/banish Lussick out of Cup?
Lol.Half a season is a meaningless sample.
Lol. Best way to achieve that would be to play in Cup, and play well. Unless he's flown over to England for an in person job interview...Lussick is a much better hooker than either of the ones named in reserve grade this week. He hasn’t been overlooked or banished. More likely is he’s trying to get back to England.
Hodgson was class. He wasn't to blame for our problems, as proven by our form this year.
He’s entitled to pick the backup he prefers, whether it’s Lussick or Hands.
No I don’t think so. The team has played better with Moses back, not because Hands is in the team.
If you rate the decisions of Barrett and Cayless that’s your business.
It's a shame he got injured early in the year. Was in great form and hasn't quite gotten back to the same level yetBryce back has made a big difference also
I don't think anyone thought Hodgson was a bad player.Hodgson was class. He wasn't to blame for our problems, as proven by our form this year.
*beforeI don't think anyone thought Hodgson was a bad player.
He always had class about him he was just cooked *when he arrived.
Hard to go back to UK with that on your resume.Injury Update: Round 18
The Parramatta Eels can provide the following injury update ahead of the Round 18 clash with the South Sydney Rabbitohs.www.parraeels.com.au
So Lussick not injured, not selected for any grade.
Doing a Rein and refusing to play Ron Massey Cup?