Babyface O'reilly
Coach
- Messages
- 12,484
Do you know the 3rd party arrangements?
No idea but if the recently published 3rd party figures are to be believed, it wouldn’t be much.
Do you know the 3rd party arrangements?
We have no marquee players now. So wouldn't surprise if that's there.No idea but if the recently published 3rd party figures are to be believed, it wouldn’t be much.
TBF Ado-Carr wants out of Melbourne as he doesnt think $550k is enough for a winger so who knows what players are worth, pick a figure it seems these days!
I guess the NRL, like most sensible people, find it hard to believe a player is going to sign for a club for $300k less than he could earn at another club maybe? Sadly clubs have proven they cant be trusted so dont blame over regulation!
Do you know the 3rd party arrangements?
TBF Ado-Carr wants out of Melbourne as he doesnt think $550k is enough for a winger so who knows what players are worth, pick a figure it seems these days!
I don't see how you can say the NRL have favoured us when we are literally one of three clubs in the history of the game to get f**ked over by this whole market value bullshit. The very first time it was applied was when Inglis came to us from the Storm and we had to release Beau Champion in order to fit him in because the value of our first contract was less than what he could've earned elsewhere.
The two other times its been mentioned were with Folau to Parra and Benji at the Tigers. I can't think of another case of it ever being raised.
No one said boo when Tedesco took a pay cut to go to the Roosters. No one kicked up a stink when Mark Gasnier signed a heavily back ended contract at the Dragons in order to fit under the cap and then retired at the end of his first season once they won the comp. There are literally hundreds of examples of the NRL not applying this rule.
You could argue that they overlook the whole market value thing every time a player doesn't test the market. I mean, what would someone like Victor Radley or Joey Manu be worth to the likes of the Tigers or the Gold Coast and yet they've signed up at the Roosters for half of what they could get elsewhere.
Fact is, it's not always about money and if you start assigning values to each player and making them sign for what they could get from desperate clubs, then you get to a point where nobody could afford to field a decent team.
$50k was just an example. I'm just saying that signing players isn't (or shouldn't be) an auction where the highest bidder gets the spoils.
Who will be goal kicker at the club? Reynolds or Mitchell. It's nice to have an outstanding talent come into the side, will be interesting to see how Bennett manages to keep it together. Souths seem a pretty tight knit team and this has potential to rustle a few jimmies around the bunch. League players can be a very sensitive bunch.
Reynolds no doubt but in saying that he is chronically injured.
Might be best he gave up kicking but his last form is too good to ignore
Are the Roosters really looking at Flanagan as a starting half?The bigger question is who will kick for the roosters.
I am assuming Flanagan.
He’s got a bit of the Jackson Hastings about him at the moment. If he keeps his head down and learns everything he can from Cronk he’ll go ok.Are the Roosters really looking at Flanagan as a starting half?
Better judges than me seem to think he has a big future in the NRL, but I just can’t see it.
Are the Roosters really looking at Flanagan as a starting half?
Better judges than me seem to think he has a big future in the NRL, but I just can’t see it.
Until he signs for Souths for $300K a year and it will no longer be about the money.
Or his manager craftily just ignored offers from Cows,Bulldogs,Titans and Tigers to make out there was no offers on the table.... in any case it was comon knowledge the Tigers deal was still well and truly on the table.In the end he just ran out of options. Souths either craftily knew this was always the likely outcome that he’d end up there, at the right price or they were simply the last-man-standing and he had to settle for what effectively was the only offer still on the table.
Yeah. Limited is how I’d describe Hutcho. Solid player, but you’d be struggling using him as a starting half. More of an old style lock at this stage.Well I don't see another option at the moment.
Keary 5/8 obviously.
Unless they play jake or verrils at half back?
I guess there is still Hutchison but he is limited to say the least.