typicalfan
Coach
- Messages
- 15,488
Hardly surprising, Latrell hasn't had a full pre season and a bit like GI was rarely in top shape in round 1. See how he is after a long season.
Does missing the bomb at the end count as a mistake or because the try was from a kick it doesn’t countIn truth I thought he looked trimmer than he had in a while.
The good news for Souths is he won't make any errors. If you don't actually do anything you can't make mistakes
Want to tell us how fat Latrell is or are you off eating humble pie
Thought tigers fans would be used to players rejecting them by now. Move on dude
I think it’s insane that people want to throw him to the wolves as a fullback already.
tbh I’ve been arguing with my own team’s fans for years about the undue pressure heaped on Latrell. They all saw him as the messiah and nothing below immortal level expectations would do, which IMO is just setting him up to fail.
he is already in the top 5 fullbacks just by deciding to play there. Whether he can get beyond that remains to be seen.
personally I don’t think it’s his work rate that needs improvement. It is, and has always been, his defensive positioning. He looks lost regularly on where he should be standing, and is caught out often not following the play or overcommitting to one side of the field.
if Bennett can fix that, he’ll be great.
I guess people are picking up on the fact that Latrell doesn’t appear to compete on every single play - you’ll find a fair few examples each game where he doesn’t get himself in position for those ‘Just in case’ scenarios... Those are the types of efforts that made Billy Slater such a great player - he was always there, even when not needed, but then for the odd occasion where some slips, or there’s a weird bounce, that effort has got him in position to make a play.
Might be unfair to judge Latrell against those standards, but he has all the physical attributes to do it.
True enough, but Latrell is never gonna be that player. Inglis was also never that player.
Slater was the fittest man in the comp. he could probably play 3 games back to back if he wanted without slowing down. Inglis and Latrell are a different breed. Huge units, far too big for the traditional fullback role, but skilful enough to make a great fist of it and cause havoc running the ball that other fullbacks can’t.
inglis’s body broke down after a few years playing fullback and probably knocked 3-4 years off his career. Hopefully Mitchell is treated with better care by Souths than Inglis was
Might be unfair to judge Latrell against those standards, but he has all the physical attributes to do it.
I guess people are picking up on the fact that Latrell doesn’t appear to compete on every single play - you’ll find a fair few examples each game where he doesn’t get himself in position for those ‘Just in case’ scenarios... Those are the types of efforts that made Billy Slater such a great player - he was always there, even when not needed, but then for the odd occasion where some slips, or there’s a weird bounce, that effort has got him in position to make a play.
I think it’s insane that people want to throw him to the wolves as a fullback already.
tbh I’ve been arguing with my own team’s fans for years about the undue pressure heaped on Latrell. They all saw him as the messiah and nothing below immortal level expectations would do, which IMO is just setting him up to fail.
he is already in the top 5 fullbacks just by deciding to play there. Whether he can get beyond that remains to be seen.
personally I don’t think it’s his work rate that needs improvement. It is, and has always been, his defensive positioning. He looks lost regularly on where he should be standing, and is caught out often not following the play or overcommitting to one side of the field.
if Bennett can fix that, he’ll be great.