Sun_Down said:He used to be a machine, absolute machine.
Thierry Henry said:???
Just point out where he stopped trying. Which games. The 4 (I think, or was it 5) at the start of 2004? You'd sack him on the basis of that?
No, I don't blame the NRL btw.
ozboy said:Let me guess, it was all a NRL conspiracy.
ozboy said:He was sacked, that's the point.
I'm asking what you think was the reason for his sacking 2 years into a 5 year deal ??
Let me guess, it was all a NRL conspiracy.
Thierry Henry said:Are you incapable of staying on topic or answering questions?
In answer to your question- an idiotic management decision.
Now, are you capable of telling me why it was a good decision, with reference to the games in which he played poorly? Because as I have already pointed out, he only played a handful of games in 2003 (some of which he was very good in, including the very last one) and about 4 games in 2004.
douglasallen91 said:haha of course it was a nrl conspiracy, ali lost form and confidence from his injury and the nrl doctors misdiagonsed his injury on purpose.
now tell me whos trying to stop nz playing in the tri nations with the same rules as the other two participants and who is holding back the nz origin happening when it's suppose to.
nospam49 said:How can anyone say that releasing a player that doesnt want to be at the club, who is playing like crap, who gets all emotional when asked to put effort in and is one of the highest paid forwards in the game.....how can getting rid of that be a bad managment decision!
ozboy said:Have a look at him now and you will see why it was a good managerial decision.
All he was, was a one year wonder, rubbish before 2002, and rubbish after 2002.
Thierry Henry said:He never said he didn't want to be at the club.
I've asked several times for you to point out where he played crap, neither you nor ozboy seem to want to come to the party.
Thierry Henry said:?
This may have escaped your attention, but he only played a handful of games in 2003 because of a serious injury. And he was quite good in some of those games (Manly, St George, Penrith).
We are talking here about his sacking from the Warriors. If you are trying to say that he was sacked for poor form then (for the 1000th time) you can only possibly be referring to the first few rounds of 2004. I don't see how it is reasonable to sack a player for a few bad games.
ESL - Wire said:He was given choice by his coach, Ali has made his decision which didn't fit into Anderson's plans.
This was down to Ali's attitude towards the club he was playing for, Ali had more important things in his life that were far more important to him. The coach didn't agree and that was the release of Ali.