So he got details of one area he was abused wrong 20 odd years after the fact? Doesn’t seem overly surprising to me.
I wouldn't be surprised if he couldn't remember what MJ was wearing, what day of the week it was, even what month of the year. But he gave a precise location of where an assault took place which couldn't have possibly happened within years of the time frame he claimed it did. That's a major problem that raises serious questions about Safechuck's credibility.
Of course the documentary was one sided, no argument from me there. Doesn’t change my opinion, I’ve always been an MJ defender and have seen heaps of evidence over the years where I thought it was always BS conspiracy to bring him down. This doco has convinced me otherwise.
So a one sided documentary in which precisely no evidence or eyewitness testimony was produced to support the tales told by these two guys convinced you? A documentary that completely ignores Robson's repeated attempts to enrich himself over the years with book deals being negotiated before he went public with his story, and desperate attempts to draw MJ's production companies into his lawsuits so he could extract money from them? The very basis of his lawsuit is entirely contradicted by his own mother's testimony of events.
How about the "Robson Family Fund" that was set up just in time for the documentary?
I'm sorry, but a closer examination of Robson in particular suggests there is a financial motive behind his allegations. Safechuck jumping on the wagon after Robson went public with them both sharing the same lawyer gives me no confidence that he is telling the truth along with his story falling apart.