I thought a big issue was our use of the interchange bench- a few here have commented our forwards were tired after abut 60 minutes of solid effort. The interchange is supposed to alleviate that. Maquire's use of the bench was questioned last year and it seems so far this year to be open to a 'what the hell?'.
Refereeing remains the big issue with WT not really getting the rub and all we can do is play to the whistle and just keep at it. The other team, when they are the better, more prominent team, will often get the momentum changing penalty, when equal offences against use are not pinged. Better teams with greater talent pool can just play on and will usually tough it out and more often than not, win. WT not possible.
Not sure what the answer is. I'd like to see WT take the more blatant cases to the NRL hierarchy and if we are dismissed to the NSW Courts. Its a professional sport, if the refereeing is not consistent and despite technology eg the bunker being available and still not correcting blatant mistakes where is the sporting change in that? If the NRL refuses to act, take it out of their hands and go to court. Put in injunction on play until decision made- then the NRL and the refs will take notice. Put in a damages claim. Its a professional sport with clubs, payers and coaches futures hanging on a level playing field. Same with the cannonball, threaten to take the player involved to court for injury suffered and financial compensation for club and player if our player is injured. Take it out of the hands of the NRL- thats twice now in 3 games we have had inconsequential penalty given to opposition players putting in that dog act.