adamkungl
Immortal
- Messages
- 42,971
Agreed it needs to be persisted with, but you’re preaching to the converted here.
The common public have no interest in watching Australia win everything, every time, with little trouble. This attitude from the public is why everything gets put on the shelf all the time in Rugby League.
It's kind of a pointless thing to fuss about. There's no easy solutions that aren't completely contrived. Worry about what you can control, not what you can't. And the RLI can't control that Australia are the best.
What they can do:
Keep building,
keep giving other nations opportunities to progress,
keep putting them in the public eye.
I would argue that Australia's dominance is kind of a symptom rather than a cause.
The deeper problem isn't so much that Australia always wins, it's that Australia has been the almost sole focus of the international scene.
The northern hemisphere should have regular trophies on offer that have nothing to do with Aus - but England has neglected growing the sport with its neighbours even worse than Aus has.
You can see this reflected in the last few years with the exposure the Pacific nations have got. People want to see Tonga v Samoa, Tonga v New Zealand. Australia not involved. And then the best of them do want a shot against Australia.
Give these other nations a running story between World Cups so the public doesnt see them once every 4 years and think theyre made up teams
I'd argue that the gap between 3 and 4 is a bigger problem than the gap between 1 and 2. We've seen NZ beat Australia a bunch of times, but until 2017 had never seen anyone knock off the top 3 in a meaningful game.
Variation at 2-5 is almost more important than the winner, imo