Sutton is the most overrated player in living memory... The guy is lazy and crap! One decent game every 10 doesn't make him good.
Get your hand off it.
They are so similar in playing style it is not funny.
For the record to whoever says Mateo is the better playmaker- Sutton has played 18 games. Scored 3 tries. 5 linebreaks. 18 Line Break Assists. 46 offloads. 45 tackle breaks and 22 Try Assists. He has pretty much set up or played a major part in most of the tries Souths have scored this year, which is more tries than any other team BTW.![]()
Pretty much exactly what I was going to say. But of course, you get some tards that spout nonsense like "he has 1 good game in 10" when really, he's been our best player just about every week and has had one bad game this year (vs Bulldogs)
Since the beginning of 2008, Sutton has played 42 games, and Mateo 31. In that period:
Sutton (per game) has made 0.8 try assists, 0.8 linebreak assists, 2.4 offloads, 2.8 tackle breaks, 0.4 linebreaks, and 0.9 errors.
Mateo (per game) has made 0.6 try assists, 0.9 linebreak assists, 3.1 offloads, 3.4 tackle breaks, 0.4 linebreaks, and 1.4 errors.
They are both very, very good players. Sutton probably creates a few more tries, whereas Mateo creates a bit more second phase play, however also makes more errors.
Im a big fan of both of these guys, but I would probably take John Sutton.
Has awesome running game and skills with it, awesome passing game, (I think he ahs the best left to right passing game in the NRL, which is usually players weaker sides to pass) a good kicking game, can play lock and five eight, and can really threaten the line.