we signed Manlys young hooker Luke Vescio
But we don't have a squad of 25, we have a squad of 35: http://www.parraeels.com.au/default.aspx?s=profile-player
See? Thirty-five faces. The NRL might demand they be separated into two tiers for administrative purposes, but on the ground they're all part of the same squad. Being in the second tier group doesn't make them any less likely to play first grade - look at Kenny Sio.
It's nothing to do with saving face mate, he will continue to play him for the same reason he signed him - because he believes he can play.
Personally I don't think Keating's shit either. He's not a playmaker but he doesn't need to be.
we signed Manlys young hooker Luke Vescio
mate Keating is a bloody good defensive player but gee he is slow with feeding the ball from dummy half. he tends to look around alot more than other 9's and when he picks it up he ends up passing it and either roberts or sandow has players all over them with no room...
that's my only gripe with MK and unfortunatly it's a big part of a hookers game that he needs to get quick ball to his player makers
I suppose its possible that a lack of organisation is putting him in two minds slowing down his decision making out of half, but i doubt it.
I reckon that's exactly what's happening. I posted it a couple of weks ago.
He was never hesitant back when every merkin wanted the ball and it didn't matter who it went to.
If Matt Keating was a bit bigger he would be an ideal workaholic backrower type like Fensom. Unforunately he is not bigger enough for that sort of role so that point is moot and it is unfortunate cause he is an absolute ordinary dummy half.
down really need to spend big bucks on a hooker. Plenty of halves in the lower levels who will never make it in the halves but could excel at hooker.
Also Keating is ok the for first 20 we just need a "livewire" to come on after the first 20.
I would actually be chasing Kris Keating - will make a good hooker, would be cheap and provides back up for the halves.