How wrong did they get it?
RTS was a worthy winner, overall and for fullback of the year- obviously a lot of class in his category with Ponga, Holmes and Tedesco.
Ferguson was probably a worthy winner too. Again, a lot of great players in the wing category.
Mitchell obviously should have won the centre prize. Ramien too, I think, should have finished ahead of Leilua.
Munster ahead of Widdop? I can live with that.
I can live with Brooks and Fifita.
Cook is a no-brainer.
I would have thought everyone in Jackson's category was ahead of him.
Taumalolo, fair enough.
So really, they only cocked up centre and second rower.
Yeah RTS deserved it, I figured once Ponga didnt play the final game I thought RTS would win as his game against the Raiders wouldve got points.
The fullback category was an interesting one, other contenders like Tedesco and Holmes had good years but in the end it was basically between Ponga and RTS.
Ferguson is an interesting one, I mean not many wingers have had a standout season but Blakes consistency earned him the trophy.
The halfback was interesting one, I thought Brooks at the start did really well, but other contenders like Cleary, Cronk probably werent good all year round.
But yeah the centre and 2nd rower, you look and think were others better and most people would say yes.
Perhaps because Jackson polled more points than any other 2nd rower, I dont know.
I like to know when they started this rule that if you're the highest polled played in that position you get that position of the year, I know in the past that didnt matter but one year Carney and Thurston got equal 5/8 of the year.