sooperdooper
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,545
Our best halves would be:
7. Pearce
6. Carney
or
7. Carney
6. Sutton/Soward/Campese
7. Pearce
6. Carney
or
7. Carney
6. Sutton/Soward/Campese
here's the problem - no loyalty & no acceptance of reality.
1) queensland are a class above & comfortably so.
2) the selectors need to stick with a cadre of players for an extended period of time regardless.
the blues were highly competitive against the all-time great qld side. why ditch pearce? because at his very young age & low experience he was unable to orchestrate a victory against possibly the greatest team in history?
the groundwork for queensland's current dominance lay obviously with the existence of talent. but also, the hard yards were made in '03, '04 & '05 by not panicking after every loss.
some need to get a firm grip on reality instead of their trouser snake.
WRONG! Pearce isn't a specialist half in terms of organisation, his main assets are pinpointed bombs when he's in the opposition 20, something that will no doubt be more valuable to us next year with Folau gone. If your genuine about watching Roosters game, you'd see that he comes in mostly as the support player from tackles 1-4 and generally only comes in at 1st reciever for a bomb, even then its usually Anasta that calls the shots.Pearce can't create? Anyone who thinks that obviously never watches Roosters games. His problem was that he was playing second fiddle to Barrett. As I said above, he should have told Barrett to get out of his way and taken control. Pearce is an organiser, Barrett is a running player. Why the hell Barrett was trying to do all the organising is beyond me.
Next year they need to pair Pearce with Sutton. And stick with them for the whole series.
WRONG! Pearce isn't a specialist half in terms of organisation, his main assets are pinpointed bombs when he's in the opposition 20, something that will no doubt be more valuable to us next year with Folau gone. If your genuine about watching Roosters game, you'd see that he comes in mostly as the support player from tackles 1-4 and generally only comes in at 1st reciever for a bomb, even then its usually Anasta that calls the shots.
IMO Soward would compliment Pearcey better as he doesn't overpower his respective halves partner and knows how to really distribute the ball out-wide, his long passing game is very nicely weighted and he's got a better ability in terms of kicking grubbers, something we're gonna need if we want to keep Jennings don't forget that he can compensate for a lack of forwards with a very long and powerful kicking game, the amount of times its helped a depleted dragons pack is amazing. Pearcey is better off running the support plays ie short passing to the inside, taking on the line with his good right foot step and putting in nicely timed kicks/bombs.
TrueThis is the f**king problem with NSW: we are riven with interclub rivalries,
Hunt v Slater a few years ago was the Farah v Ennis of today.I mean, have you EVER seen a Queensland fan deathride any of their own players because they don't like them (or their club)?
Bowen vs. Hunt was far more heated.