Most Controversial Forummer of the Year - Nominations

[ParraMatt]

This shouldnt be an award

 

[Anonymous]

This shouldnt be an award

Now thats controversial...

 

[ParraMatt]

:lol: :lol:

 

[The Backpacker]

Now that I'm sure I'm not going to get tarred and feathered or create a lolly scramble of epic proportions, I'd like to nominate the good Lord Reynoldson for most controversial forummer of the year.

This is the man that had the hide to show his face at Easts leagues club after taking the favourite son Hodge's name in vain and made implications of a tarnished halo all while running out under the biblical colours of red, white and blue. And, while he can be forgiven for his Bulldog salary cap claims, he's due the penance of wearing a warning for the next year, of a blasphemiser of contraversial proportions.

Justin Hodges? Oh yeah, I remember him. That loud mouth Easts player that got a little bruise on his knee so had to sit out for the whole season. Hey, as I said in my article, he should'e been suspended for the season, that injury was just Karma. :lol: :lol: :lol:

It was also claiming that the Roosters should have lost their premiership I think. :lol: :lol: :lol: And I'm surprised that my latest Andrew Johns is all talk and definitely not the best player in the world thing didn't get a mention here. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And what do you mean by the "good Lord Reynoldson"? I've never heard of him.

Say it Lord - Hodges is my favourite player. I'm sorry he was injured by the evil sandcorp turf. Easts were rightful winners in 2002...You can do it.

Go to hell. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I assume that Dragon Fanatic was the one who plageurised their post? If it's a vote for most controversial off field forumer, I'll vote for Dragon Fanatic just ahead of ParraMatt's poaching.

If this is a vote for on-field controversy, well, I've been told I should be nominated for that. DOWN WITH JUSTIN HODGES! (Whoops, I shouldn't say that too loudly, some team-mates may hear me. :lol: :lol: :lol: But there is always rules against nominating yourself, so I have no idea who to choose if it's "on-field" controversy.

Saddly I agree with you. I feel that nothing he has done has affected the forum sevens. Just ruffled a few feathers (sorry about the pun) over at the cafe district.

And Andrew Johns is sooooo overrated. One day we will all realise.

I am assuming by your comment DvdHntr, that you are referring to Lord Reynoldson's nomination in this post?

Could you please direct me to the section where it says that the person nominated has to have 'done' something to affect the sevens. Whilst any number of people could have been nominated regarding their 'off field' behaviour, I chose to use my nomination to choose someone who was disputatious 'on field'. I am assuming you read every one of his articles this year and obviously have a different opinion to mine as to what you'd consider controversial writing and not. I think, going from what Lord has said at the end of his post, if he was able to, he'd nominate himself for his 'on field' writing. This nomination was in fun, you may have missed the and :lol: by the people nominating him and we are entitled to our opinions and nominations, the same as you are. I don't see the point of making negative comments about other peoples nominations, when this (the awards) are supposed to be all in fun anyway.

I'm not sure if you were trying to be facetious with your cafe district comments but do these cliches really need to be brought into the game of sevens? Assuming - once again, of course - that you were referring to our sevens team, I don't think this is necessary to start personalising these well used, over done and somewhat boreing cliches to a team because of their name. If you want to go over that tired game, visit the appropriate team forums.

 

[The Backpacker]

The nominations so far...

Anastabation
Dragon Fanatic 4 nominations
Lord Reynoldson 3 nominations
ParraMatt 3 nominations

Keep them coming...

 

[Genghis Chan]

Sounds like more controversy, I nominate Backpacker and dvdnhtr. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Fight fight fight fight (common everyone, start the chant!) Fight fight fight fight. :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[...Morticia...]

Sounds like more controversy, I nominate Backpacker and dvdnhtr. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Fight fight fight fight (common everyone, start the chant!) Fight fight fight fight. :lol: :lol: :lol:

you trying for another vote lord reynoldson? :shock: bp dont fight. believe me i've been trying to wind him up for years with nosucess.

 

[The Backpacker]

I nominate Backpacker and dvdnhtr.

Sorry Lord, you've already used your nomination quota. ;-)

At last check - mouth guard isn't in the turf, lollies are still in the pocket and all toys are firmly imbedded in the sandpit.

Nominations still stand as.....

Anastabation
Dragon Fanatic 4 nominations
Lord Reynoldson 3 nominations
ParraMatt 3 nominations

Keep the nominations coming...

 

[Raider_69]

This comp is a joke, yes i am partt of it, but seriously we had a season full of more shit than Soccer Australia!
and thats hard to beat

My nomination of most controvesial is this comp, it is filled with a sea of hatred and moronic people!

GOTO HELL!!
Untill the Rhinos or a Raiders team is in here this comp will reamin a disgrace........ THANKYOU VERY MUCH MATTO!

 

[Anonymous]

This comp is a joke, yes i am partt of it, but seriously we had a season full of more sh*t than Soccer Australia!
and thats hard to beat

My nomination of most controvesial is this comp, it is filled with a sea of hatred and moronic people!

GOTO HELL!!
Untill the Rhinos or a Raiders team is in here this comp will reamin a disgrace........ THANKYOU VERY MUCH MATTO!

LOL... I was going say you dont come here very often but by golly, you've got more IP sock-puppets than I've had hot dinners.
How many identities do you want? :lol:
I see we're going to have to keep an eye on this happy chappy.

 

[Dragon Fanatic]

Raider, don't try to be controversial.

 

[Raider_69]

ok ya's cought me out...... i thought seen as thou i only posted once then i would try to win something
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

and i have only one identity
i post from several different computers thou, which can include any number of about 120 school computers

 

[Anonymous]

ok ya's cought me out...... i thought seen as thou i only posted once then i would try to win something
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

and i have only one identity
i post from several different computers thou, which can include any number of about 120 school computers

I visit the odd internet cafe as well. ;-)
Thats cool Raider_69... I was ready to give you my vote too.
Better luck next year. :lol:

 

[Raider_69]

ok ya's cought me out...... i thought seen as thou i only posted once then i would try to win something
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

and i have only one identity
i post from several different computers thou, which can include any number of about 120 school computers

I visit the odd internet cafe as well. ;-)
Thats cool Raider_69... I was ready to give you my vote too.
Better luck next year. :lol:

well i certinally didnt win the sharks any games, i certinally lost them a few with non posts...... so i thought i would have an attempt at winning us something

 

[The Engineers Room]

Now that I'm sure I'm not going to get tarred and feathered or create a lolly scramble of epic proportions, I'd like to nominate the good Lord Reynoldson for most controversial forummer of the year.

This is the man that had the hide to show his face at Easts leagues club after taking the favourite son Hodge's name in vain and made implications of a tarnished halo all while running out under the biblical colours of red, white and blue. And, while he can be forgiven for his Bulldog salary cap claims, he's due the penance of wearing a warning for the next year, of a blasphemiser of contraversial proportions.

Justin Hodges? Oh yeah, I remember him. That loud mouth Easts player that got a little bruise on his knee so had to sit out for the whole season. Hey, as I said in my article, he should'e been suspended for the season, that injury was just Karma. :lol: :lol: :lol:

It was also claiming that the Roosters should have lost their premiership I think. :lol: :lol: :lol: And I'm surprised that my latest Andrew Johns is all talk and definitely not the best player in the world thing didn't get a mention here. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And what do you mean by the "good Lord Reynoldson"? I've never heard of him.

Say it Lord - Hodges is my favourite player. I'm sorry he was injured by the evil sandcorp turf. Easts were rightful winners in 2002...You can do it.

Go to hell. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I assume that Dragon Fanatic was the one who plageurised their post? If it's a vote for most controversial off field forumer, I'll vote for Dragon Fanatic just ahead of ParraMatt's poaching.

If this is a vote for on-field controversy, well, I've been told I should be nominated for that. DOWN WITH JUSTIN HODGES! (Whoops, I shouldn't say that too loudly, some team-mates may hear me. :lol: :lol: :lol: But there is always rules against nominating yourself, so I have no idea who to choose if it's "on-field" controversy.

Saddly I agree with you. I feel that nothing he has done has affected the forum sevens. Just ruffled a few feathers (sorry about the pun) over at the cafe district.

And Andrew Johns is sooooo overrated. One day we will all realise.

I am assuming by your comment DvdHntr, that you are referring to Lord Reynoldson's nomination in this post?

Could you please direct me to the section where it says that the person nominated has to have 'done' something to affect the sevens. Whilst any number of people could have been nominated regarding their 'off field' behaviour, I chose to use my nomination to choose someone who was disputatious 'on field'. I am assuming you read every one of his articles this year and obviously have a different opinion to mine as to what you'd consider controversial writing and not. I think, going from what Lord has said at the end of his post, if he was able to, he'd nominate himself for his 'on field' writing. This nomination was in fun, you may have missed the and :lol: by the people nominating him and we are entitled to our opinions and nominations, the same as you are. I don't see the point of making negative comments about other peoples nominations, when this (the awards) are supposed to be all in fun anyway.

I'm not sure if you were trying to be facetious with your cafe district comments but do these cliches really need to be brought into the game of sevens? Assuming - once again, of course - that you were referring to our sevens team, I don't think this is necessary to start personalising these well used, over done and somewhat boreing cliches to a team because of their name. If you want to go over that tired game, visit the appropriate team forums.

Sorry I should have attached this to my post. :lol: :lol:

Now that makes it all better ;-)

Sounds like someone has had a little too many cups of cino.
But what would I know I'm just a flano wearign derro from the filthy Western Suburbs. Hey we all have labels for each other I personally think I get the short end of the stick.

 

[Raider_69]

hey hey!
never be ashamd of wearing the old flanos and jeans......

 

[Genghis Chan]

Now that I'm sure I'm not going to get tarred and feathered or create a lolly scramble of epic proportions, I'd like to nominate the good Lord Reynoldson for most controversial forummer of the year.

This is the man that had the hide to show his face at Easts leagues club after taking the favourite son Hodge's name in vain and made implications of a tarnished halo all while running out under the biblical colours of red, white and blue. And, while he can be forgiven for his Bulldog salary cap claims, he's due the penance of wearing a warning for the next year, of a blasphemiser of contraversial proportions.

Justin Hodges? Oh yeah, I remember him. That loud mouth Easts player that got a little bruise on his knee so had to sit out for the whole season. Hey, as I said in my article, he should'e been suspended for the season, that injury was just Karma. :lol: :lol: :lol:

It was also claiming that the Roosters should have lost their premiership I think. :lol: :lol: :lol: And I'm surprised that my latest Andrew Johns is all talk and definitely not the best player in the world thing didn't get a mention here. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And what do you mean by the "good Lord Reynoldson"? I've never heard of him.

Say it Lord - Hodges is my favourite player. I'm sorry he was injured by the evil sandcorp turf. Easts were rightful winners in 2002...You can do it.

Go to hell. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I assume that Dragon Fanatic was the one who plageurised their post? If it's a vote for most controversial off field forumer, I'll vote for Dragon Fanatic just ahead of ParraMatt's poaching.

If this is a vote for on-field controversy, well, I've been told I should be nominated for that. DOWN WITH JUSTIN HODGES! (Whoops, I shouldn't say that too loudly, some team-mates may hear me. :lol: :lol: :lol: But there is always rules against nominating yourself, so I have no idea who to choose if it's "on-field" controversy.

Saddly I agree with you. I feel that nothing he has done has affected the forum sevens. Just ruffled a few feathers (sorry about the pun) over at the cafe district.

And Andrew Johns is sooooo overrated. One day we will all realise.

I am assuming by your comment DvdHntr, that you are referring to Lord Reynoldson's nomination in this post?

Could you please direct me to the section where it says that the person nominated has to have 'done' something to affect the sevens. Whilst any number of people could have been nominated regarding their 'off field' behaviour, I chose to use my nomination to choose someone who was disputatious 'on field'. I am assuming you read every one of his articles this year and obviously have a different opinion to mine as to what you'd consider controversial writing and not. I think, going from what Lord has said at the end of his post, if he was able to, he'd nominate himself for his 'on field' writing. This nomination was in fun, you may have missed the and :lol: by the people nominating him and we are entitled to our opinions and nominations, the same as you are. I don't see the point of making negative comments about other peoples nominations, when this (the awards) are supposed to be all in fun anyway.

I'm not sure if you were trying to be facetious with your cafe district comments but do these cliches really need to be brought into the game of sevens? Assuming - once again, of course - that you were referring to our sevens team, I don't think this is necessary to start personalising these well used, over done and somewhat boreing cliches to a team because of their name. If you want to go over that tired game, visit the appropriate team forums.

Sorry I should have attached this to my post. :lol: :lol:

Now that makes it all better ;-)

Sounds like someone has had a little too many cups of cino.
But what would I know I'm just a flano wearign derro from the filthy Western Suburbs. Hey we all have labels for each other I personally think I get the short end of the stick.

All of this quoting of quotes of quote of quotes of quotes makes for a long long long long thread. ;-) :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[Raider_69]

Now that I'm sure I'm not going to get tarred and feathered or create a lolly scramble of epic proportions, I'd like to nominate the good Lord Reynoldson for most controversial forummer of the year.

This is the man that had the hide to show his face at Easts leagues club after taking the favourite son Hodge's name in vain and made implications of a tarnished halo all while running out under the biblical colours of red, white and blue. And, while he can be forgiven for his Bulldog salary cap claims, he's due the penance of wearing a warning for the next year, of a blasphemiser of contraversial proportions.

Justin Hodges? Oh yeah, I remember him. That loud mouth Easts player that got a little bruise on his knee so had to sit out for the whole season. Hey, as I said in my article, he should'e been suspended for the season, that injury was just Karma. :lol: :lol: :lol:

It was also claiming that the Roosters should have lost their premiership I think. :lol: :lol: :lol: And I'm surprised that my latest Andrew Johns is all talk and definitely not the best player in the world thing didn't get a mention here. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And what do you mean by the "good Lord Reynoldson"? I've never heard of him.

Say it Lord - Hodges is my favourite player. I'm sorry he was injured by the evil sandcorp turf. Easts were rightful winners in 2002...You can do it.

Go to hell. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I assume that Dragon Fanatic was the one who plageurised their post? If it's a vote for most controversial off field forumer, I'll vote for Dragon Fanatic just ahead of ParraMatt's poaching.

If this is a vote for on-field controversy, well, I've been told I should be nominated for that. DOWN WITH JUSTIN HODGES! (Whoops, I shouldn't say that too loudly, some team-mates may hear me. :lol: :lol: :lol: But there is always rules against nominating yourself, so I have no idea who to choose if it's "on-field" controversy.

Saddly I agree with you. I feel that nothing he has done has affected the forum sevens. Just ruffled a few feathers (sorry about the pun) over at the cafe district.

And Andrew Johns is sooooo overrated. One day we will all realise.

I am assuming by your comment DvdHntr, that you are referring to Lord Reynoldson's nomination in this post?

Could you please direct me to the section where it says that the person nominated has to have 'done' something to affect the sevens. Whilst any number of people could have been nominated regarding their 'off field' behaviour, I chose to use my nomination to choose someone who was disputatious 'on field'. I am assuming you read every one of his articles this year and obviously have a different opinion to mine as to what you'd consider controversial writing and not. I think, going from what Lord has said at the end of his post, if he was able to, he'd nominate himself for his 'on field' writing. This nomination was in fun, you may have missed the and :lol: by the people nominating him and we are entitled to our opinions and nominations, the same as you are. I don't see the point of making negative comments about other peoples nominations, when this (the awards) are supposed to be all in fun anyway.

I'm not sure if you were trying to be facetious with your cafe district comments but do these cliches really need to be brought into the game of sevens? Assuming - once again, of course - that you were referring to our sevens team, I don't think this is necessary to start personalising these well used, over done and somewhat boreing cliches to a team because of their name. If you want to go over that tired game, visit the appropriate team forums.

Sorry I should have attached this to my post. :lol: :lol:

Now that makes it all better ;-)

Sounds like someone has had a little too many cups of cino.
But what would I know I'm just a flano wearign derro from the filthy Western Suburbs. Hey we all have labels for each other I personally think I get the short end of the stick.

All of this quoting of quotes of quote of quotes of quotes makes for a long long long long thread. ;-) :lol: :lol: :lol:

well that was a bloody useless post wasnt it.......
BTW im am aware of the irony involved in this post
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[The Backpacker]

Sorry I should have attached this to my post. :lol: :lol:

Now that makes it all better ;-)

Sounds like someone has had a little too many cups of cino.
But what would I know I'm just a flano wearign derro from the filthy Western Suburbs. Hey we all have labels for each other I personally think I get the short end of the stick.

I believe it's a short black we drink here on the west coast. ;-)

Personally, I don't care whether you wear flannel, leather, Armani or a pink feather boa with high heels, I'm just not that kind of bloke. :shock: No matter what your stereotypes say. 8-[

And Lord...try as you might, I don't think you're going to win this award.

Nominations so far.....

Anastabation
Dragon Fanatic 4 nominations
Lord Reynoldson 3 nominations
ParraMatt 3 nominations
MattO
Keep the nominations coming...

 

[Genghis Chan]

Now that I'm sure I'm not going to get tarred and feathered or create a lolly scramble of epic proportions, I'd like to nominate the good Lord Reynoldson for most controversial forummer of the year.

This is the man that had the hide to show his face at Easts leagues club after taking the favourite son Hodge's name in vain and made implications of a tarnished halo all while running out under the biblical colours of red, white and blue. And, while he can be forgiven for his Bulldog salary cap claims, he's due the penance of wearing a warning for the next year, of a blasphemiser of contraversial proportions.

Justin Hodges? Oh yeah, I remember him. That loud mouth Easts player that got a little bruise on his knee so had to sit out for the whole season. Hey, as I said in my article, he should'e been suspended for the season, that injury was just Karma. :lol: :lol: :lol:

It was also claiming that the Roosters should have lost their premiership I think. :lol: :lol: :lol: And I'm surprised that my latest Andrew Johns is all talk and definitely not the best player in the world thing didn't get a mention here. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And what do you mean by the "good Lord Reynoldson"? I've never heard of him.

Say it Lord - Hodges is my favourite player. I'm sorry he was injured by the evil sandcorp turf. Easts were rightful winners in 2002...You can do it.

Go to hell. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I assume that Dragon Fanatic was the one who plageurised their post? If it's a vote for most controversial off field forumer, I'll vote for Dragon Fanatic just ahead of ParraMatt's poaching.

If this is a vote for on-field controversy, well, I've been told I should be nominated for that. DOWN WITH JUSTIN HODGES! (Whoops, I shouldn't say that too loudly, some team-mates may hear me. :lol: :lol: :lol: But there is always rules against nominating yourself, so I have no idea who to choose if it's "on-field" controversy.

Saddly I agree with you. I feel that nothing he has done has affected the forum sevens. Just ruffled a few feathers (sorry about the pun) over at the cafe district.

And Andrew Johns is sooooo overrated. One day we will all realise.

I am assuming by your comment DvdHntr, that you are referring to Lord Reynoldson's nomination in this post?

Could you please direct me to the section where it says that the person nominated has to have 'done' something to affect the sevens. Whilst any number of people could have been nominated regarding their 'off field' behaviour, I chose to use my nomination to choose someone who was disputatious 'on field'. I am assuming you read every one of his articles this year and obviously have a different opinion to mine as to what you'd consider controversial writing and not. I think, going from what Lord has said at the end of his post, if he was able to, he'd nominate himself for his 'on field' writing. This nomination was in fun, you may have missed the and :lol: by the people nominating him and we are entitled to our opinions and nominations, the same as you are. I don't see the point of making negative comments about other peoples nominations, when this (the awards) are supposed to be all in fun anyway.

I'm not sure if you were trying to be facetious with your cafe district comments but do these cliches really need to be brought into the game of sevens? Assuming - once again, of course - that you were referring to our sevens team, I don't think this is necessary to start personalising these well used, over done and somewhat boreing cliches to a team because of their name. If you want to go over that tired game, visit the appropriate team forums.

Sorry I should have attached this to my post. :lol: :lol:

Now that makes it all better ;-)

Sounds like someone has had a little too many cups of cino.
But what would I know I'm just a flano wearign derro from the filthy Western Suburbs. Hey we all have labels for each other I personally think I get the short end of the stick.

All of this quoting of quotes of quote of quotes of quotes makes for a long long long long thread. ;-) :lol: :lol: :lol:

well that was a bloody useless post wasnt it.......
BTW im am aware of the irony involved in this post
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Useless? yeah, your probably right. But I have absolutely no idea where the irony is. :lol: :lol: :lol:

(Backpacker started it! Honestly, it's all his fault! :lol: :lol: :lol: